US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):150-6. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182988afe.
Unvented chest seals (CSs) are currently recommended for the management of penetrating thoracic injuries in the battlefield. Since no supporting data exist, we compared the efficacy of a preferred unvented with that of a vented CS in a novel swine model of pneumothorax (PTx).
An open chest wound was created in the left thorax of spontaneously air-breathing anesthetized pigs (n = 8). A CS was applied over the injury, then tension PTx was induced by incremental air injections (0.2 L) into the pleural cavity via a cannula that was also used to measure intrapleural pressure (IP). Both CS were tested on each pig in series. Tidal volume (V(T)), respiratory rate, IP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, central venous pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, venous and peripheral oxygen saturations (SvO2, SpO2) were recorded. Tension PTx was defined as a mean IP equal to or greater than +1 mm Hg plus significant (20-30%) deviation in baseline levels of the previously mentioned parameters and confirmed by chest x-ray study. PaO2 and PaCo2 were also measured.
PTx produced immediate breathing difficulty and significant rises in IP and pulmonary arterial pressure and falls in V(T), SpO2, and SvO2. Both CSs returned these parameters to near baseline within 5 minutes of application. After vented CS was applied, serial air injections up to 2 L resulted in no significant change in the previously mentioned parameters. After unvented CS application, progressive deterioration of all respiratory parameters and onset of tension PTx were observed in all subjects after approximately 1.4-L air injection.
Both vented and unvented CSs provided immediate improvements in breathing and blood oxygenation in our model of penetrating thoracic trauma. However, in the presence of ongoing intrapleural air accumulation, the unvented CS led to tension PTx, hypoxemia, and possible respiratory arrest, while the vented CS prevented these outcomes.
目前,无通风胸贴(CS)被推荐用于战场穿透性胸部损伤的治疗。由于没有支持性数据,我们在一种新型猪气胸(PTx)模型中比较了首选无通风 CS 与通风 CS 的疗效。
在自主呼吸麻醉猪的左胸腔上创建开放性胸部伤口。在损伤处应用 CS,然后通过套管向胸腔内逐渐注入 0.2 L 的空气以诱发张力性气胸,该套管还用于测量胸腔内压力(IP)。每个猪均按顺序连续测试两种 CS。记录潮气量(V(T))、呼吸频率、IP、心率、平均动脉压、心输出量、中心静脉压、肺动脉压、静脉和外周血氧饱和度(SvO2、SpO2)。张力性气胸定义为平均 IP 等于或大于+1mmHg,且先前提到的参数基线水平出现显著(20-30%)偏差,并通过胸部 X 线研究确认。还测量了 PaO2 和 PaCO2。
气胸导致立即出现呼吸困难,IP 和肺动脉压显著升高,V(T)、SpO2 和 SvO2 降低。两种 CS 在应用后 5 分钟内均使这些参数恢复接近基线水平。在应用通风 CS 后,连续注入高达 2L 的空气不会导致先前提到的参数发生显著变化。在应用无通风 CS 后,所有猪在大约 1.4L 空气注入后观察到所有呼吸参数逐渐恶化并出现张力性气胸。
在我们的穿透性胸部创伤模型中,通风和无通风 CS 都能立即改善呼吸和血氧。然而,在持续发生胸腔内空气积聚的情况下,无通风 CS 会导致张力性气胸、低氧血症和可能的呼吸暂停,而通风 CS 则可预防这些结果。