Smith R A, Smith D B
Department of Anesthesiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa.
Chest. 1995 Mar;107(3):805-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.3.805.
During airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), tidal ventilation occurs between the increased lung volume established by the application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and the relaxation volume of the respiratory system. Concern has been expressed that release of CPAP may cause unstable alveoli to collapse and not reinflate when airway pressure is restored.
To compare pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation in animals with acute lung injury during CPAP with and without APRV.
Experimental, subject-controlled, randomized crossover investigation.
Anesthesiology research laboratory, University of South Florida College of Medicine Health Sciences Center.
Ten pigs of either sex.
Acute lung injury was induced with an intravenous infusion of oleic acid (72 micrograms/kg) followed by randomly alternated 60-min trials of CPAP with and without APRV. Continuous positive airway pressure was titrated to produce an arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation of at least 95% (FIO2 = 0.21). Airway pressure release ventilation was arbitrarily cycled to atmospheric pressure 10 times per minute with a release time titrated to coincide with attainment of respiratory system relaxation volume.
Cardiac output, arterial and mixed venous pH, blood gas tensions, hemoglobin concentration and oxyhemoglobin saturation, central venous pressure, pulmonary and systemic artery pressures, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, airway gas flow, airway pressure, and pleural pressure were measured. Tidal volume (VT), dynamic lung compliance, intrapulmonary venous admixture, pulmonary vascular resistance, systemic vascular resistance, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption, and oxygen extraction ratio were calculated.
Central venous infusion of oleic acid reduced PaO2 from 94 +/- 4 mm Hg to 52 +/- 9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD) (p < 0.001) and dynamic lung compliance from 40 +/- 6 mL/cm H2O to 20 +/- 6 mL/cm H2O (p = 0.002) and increased venous admixture from 13 +/- 3% to 32 +/- 7% (p < 0.001) in ten swine weighing 33.3 +/- 4.1 kg while they were spontaneously breathing room air. After induction of lung injury, the swine received CPAP (14.7 +/- 3.3 cm H2O) with or without APRV at 10 breaths per minute with a release time of 1.1 +/- 0.2 s. Although mean transpulmonary pressure was significantly greater during CPAP (11.7 +/- 3.3 cm H2O) vs APRV (9.4 +/- 3.8 cm H2O) (p < 0.001), there were no differences in hemodynamic variables. PaCO2 was decreased and pHa was increased during APRV vs CPAP (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005). PaO2 declined from 83 +/- 4 mm Hg to 79 +/- 4 mm Hg (p = 0.004) during APRV, but arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (96.6 +/- 1.4% vs 96.9 +/- 1.3%) did not. Intrapulmonary venous admixture (9 +/- 3% vs 11 +/- 5%) and oxygen delivery (469 +/- 67 mL/min vs 479 +/- 66 mL/min) were not altered. After treatment periods and removal of CPAP for 60 min, PaO2 and intrapulmonary venous admixture returned to baseline values.
Intrapulmonary venous admixture, arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation, and oxygen delivery were maintained by APRV at levels induced by CPAP despite the presence of unstable alveoli. Decrease in PaO2 was caused by increase in pHa and decrease in PaCO2, not by deterioration of pulmonary function. We conclude that periodic decrease of airway pressure created by APRV does not cause significant deterioration in oxygenation or lung mechanics.
在气道压力释放通气(APRV)期间,潮气量出现在应用持续气道正压(CPAP)所建立的增加的肺容积与呼吸系统的松弛容积之间。有人担心,CPAP的释放可能会导致不稳定的肺泡塌陷,并且在气道压力恢复时无法重新充气。
比较在有和没有APRV的CPAP期间急性肺损伤动物的肺力学和氧合情况。
实验性、受试者对照、随机交叉研究。
南佛罗里达大学医学院健康科学中心麻醉学研究实验室。
10头猪,雌雄不限。
静脉输注油酸(7μg/kg)诱导急性肺损伤,随后随机交替进行60分钟的有和没有APRV的CPAP试验。持续气道正压进行滴定,以使动脉氧合血红蛋白饱和度至少达到95%(FIO2=0.21)。气道压力释放通气以每分钟10次的频率任意循环至大气压,释放时间进行滴定,以使其与达到呼吸系统松弛容积相一致。
测量心输出量、动脉和混合静脉pH值、血气张力、血红蛋白浓度和氧合血红蛋白饱和度、中心静脉压、肺和体动脉压力、肺动脉闭塞压、气道气体流量、气道压力和胸膜压力。计算潮气量(VT)、动态肺顺应性、肺内静脉混合、肺血管阻力、体血管阻力、氧输送、氧消耗和氧摄取率。
在10头体重为33.3±4.1kg的猪自主呼吸室内空气时,中心静脉输注油酸使PaO2从94±4mmHg降至52±9mmHg(平均值±1标准差)(p<0.001),动态肺顺应性从40±6mL/cmH2O降至20±6mL/cmH2O(p=0.002),静脉混合从13±3%增加至32±7%(p<0.001)。诱导肺损伤后,猪接受每分钟10次呼吸、释放时间为1.1±0.2秒的有或没有APRV的CPAP(14.7±3.3cmH2O)。尽管CPAP期间的平均跨肺压(11.7±3.3cmH2O)显著高于APRV期间(9.4±3.8cmH2O)(p<0.001),但血流动力学变量无差异。与CPAP相比,APRV期间PaCO2降低,pHa升高(p=0.003和p=0.005)。APRV期间PaO2从83±4mmHg降至79±4mmHg(p=0.004),但动脉氧合血红蛋白饱和度(96.6±1.4%对96.9±1.3%)未改变。肺内静脉混合(9±3%对11±5%)和氧输送(469±67mL/min对479±66mL/min)未改变。治疗期结束并去除CPAP 60分钟后,PaO2和肺内静脉混合恢复至基线值。
尽管存在不稳定肺泡,APRV仍将肺内静脉混合、动脉氧合血红蛋白饱和度和氧输送维持在CPAP诱导的水平。PaO2的降低是由pHa升高和PaCO2降低引起的,而不是肺功能恶化。我们得出结论,APRV引起的气道压力周期性降低不会导致氧合或肺力学的显著恶化。