Evol Anthropol. 2013 Jul-Aug;22(4):186-95. doi: 10.1002/evan.21364.
The study of cooperation is rich with theoretical models and laboratory experiments that have greatly advanced our knowledge of human uniqueness, but have sometimes lacked ecological validity. We therefore emphasize the need to tie discussions of human cooperation to the natural history of our species and its closest relatives, focusing on behavioral contexts best suited to reveal underlying selection pressures and evolved decision rules. Food sharing is a fundamental form of cooperation that is well-studied across primates and is particularly noteworthy because of its central role in shaping evolved human life history, social organization, and cooperative psychology. Here we synthesize available evidence on food sharing in humans and other primates, tracing the origins of offspring provisioning, mutualism, trade, and reciprocity throughout the primate order. While primates may gain some benefits from sharing, humans, faced with more collective action problems in a risky foraging niche, expanded on primate patterns to buffer risk and recruit mates and allies through reciprocity and signaling, and established co-evolving social norms of production and sharing. Differences in the necessity for sharing are reflected in differences in sharing psychology across species, thus helping to explain unique aspects of our evolved cooperative psychology.
合作研究具有丰富的理论模型和实验室实验,这些模型和实验极大地促进了我们对人类独特性的认识,但有时缺乏生态有效性。因此,我们强调需要将人类合作的讨论与我们物种的自然历史及其最亲近的亲属联系起来,重点关注最适合揭示潜在选择压力和进化决策规则的行为背景。食物分享是一种在灵长类动物中得到广泛研究的基本合作形式,特别值得注意,因为它在塑造进化后的人类生活史、社会组织和合作心理学方面发挥了核心作用。在这里,我们综合了人类和其他灵长类动物中食物分享的现有证据,追溯了后代供养、互惠、交易和互惠在整个灵长目动物中的起源。虽然灵长类动物可能从分享中获得一些好处,但人类在一个风险觅食的小生境中面临更多的集体行动问题,通过互惠和信号扩大了灵长类动物的模式,以缓冲风险,并通过互惠和信号招募配偶和盟友,并建立了共同进化的生产和分享社会规范。物种间分享心理的必要性差异反映在分享心理的差异上,从而有助于解释我们进化后的合作心理的独特方面。