University of St Andrews, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, South Street, KY16 9JP St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.
University of St Andrews, School of Psychology & Neuroscience, South Street, KY16 9JP St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
Reciprocity is a ubiquitous and important human trait. Still, the evolutionary origin is largely unclear, partly because it is believed that our closest living relatives, other primates, do not reciprocate help. Consequently, reciprocity is suggested to have evolved in the human linage only. However, our systematic review of studies investigating reciprocity in non-human primates revealed that, contrary to common perception, there are more positive than negative findings in both experimental and observational studies. Furthermore, we argue that negative findings can provide important insights. We found that reciprocity is not confined to unrelated individuals. In addition, reciprocity can be influenced by the choice of experimental design, relationship quality, social services and temporal scales. Thus, negative findings should not be used as evidence of no reciprocity but as the building blocks for a more comprehensive theory. Based on our review, we conclude that reciprocity in primates is present but underestimated. We close by suggesting further steps that could pave the way for future research aimed at understanding the evolutionary origins of reciprocity.
互惠是一种普遍存在且重要的人类特征。然而,其进化起源在很大程度上仍不清楚,部分原因是人们认为我们最亲近的灵长类动物近亲——其他灵长类动物不会回报帮助。因此,有人认为互惠仅在人类谱系中进化而来。然而,我们对非人类灵长类动物互惠行为研究的系统综述表明,与普遍看法相反,无论是在实验研究还是观察研究中,积极的发现都多于消极的发现。此外,我们认为负面的发现可以提供重要的见解。我们发现,互惠并不局限于无关的个体。此外,互惠可以受到实验设计选择、关系质量、社会服务和时间尺度的影响。因此,负面的发现不应该被用作没有互惠的证据,而应该作为更全面理论的基础。基于我们的综述,我们得出结论,灵长类动物中确实存在互惠行为,但被低估了。最后,我们提出了进一步的步骤,为未来旨在理解互惠进化起源的研究铺平了道路。