Bonkovsky H L, Slaker D P, Bills E B, Wolf D C
Department of Biochemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gastroenterology. 1990 Oct;99(4):1079-91. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90629-f.
Liver biopsy with measurement of hepatic iron concentration is the most certain procedure for evaluation of iron-storage disease, although use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging procedures recently have been proposed as alternative, noninvasive methods for estimating the degree of iron overload. The results of these imaging procedures were compared with those of other noninvasive techniques and liver biopsies in 48 patients. Final diagnoses, based on synthesis of clinical and laboratory data, included (a) primary hemochromatosis (n = 25; 19 homozygous, 6 heterozygous); (b) secondary hemochromatosis (n = 7); (c) alcoholic liver disease (n = 11); (d) chronic active hepatitis (n = 3); and (e) other (n = 2). Serum ferritin and computed tomography or magnetic resonance scanning had 100% sensitivity in detecting hepatic iron overload more than fivefold above the upper limit of normal (greater than 10.7 mumol Fe/100 mg dry liver) but did not detect lesser degrees of iron overload reliably, including those found in 6 of 13 patients with untreated homozygous primary hemochromatosis and 3 of 7 with secondary hemochromatosis. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were more specific than ferritin (64% and 92% vs. 21%) in the detection of iron excess, more than five times the upper limit of normal. Among magnetic resonance imaging measures, the ratio of the second echo signal intensities of liver to paraspinous muscle was the most sensitive and most specific for detection of this degree of iron overload. The degree of correlation between hepatic iron concentration and results of noninvasive laboratory or imaging studies were insufficient to permit prediction of hepatic iron content by noninvasive studies alone. It is concluded that computed tomography or magnetic resonance scanning as currently usually used is not cost-effective in routine evaluation of iron overload, although these imaging procedures may play a role in patients in whom liver biopsy is contraindicated. Because of their low cost and ready availability, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation tests remain the preferred screening studies for iron overload. Liver biopsy with quantitative iron measurement remains the study of choice for the definitive diagnosis of hemochromatosis.
肝活检并测定肝铁浓度是评估铁储存疾病最确切的方法,尽管最近有人提出使用计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像程序作为估计铁过载程度的替代非侵入性方法。对48例患者的这些成像程序结果与其他非侵入性技术及肝活检结果进行了比较。基于临床和实验室数据综合得出的最终诊断包括:(a) 原发性血色素沉着症(n = 25;19例纯合子,6例杂合子);(b) 继发性血色素沉着症(n = 7);(c) 酒精性肝病(n = 11);(d) 慢性活动性肝炎(n = 3);以及(e) 其他(n = 2)。血清铁蛋白和计算机断层扫描或磁共振扫描在检测肝铁过载超过正常上限五倍以上(大于10.7 μmol Fe/100 mg干肝)时敏感性为100%,但不能可靠检测较轻程度的铁过载,包括13例未经治疗的纯合子原发性血色素沉着症患者中的6例以及7例继发性血色素沉着症患者中的3例。在检测铁过量超过正常上限五倍以上时,计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像比铁蛋白更具特异性(分别为64%和92%,而铁蛋白为21%)。在磁共振成像测量中,肝脏与椎旁肌第二回波信号强度之比对检测这种程度的铁过载最敏感且最具特异性。肝铁浓度与非侵入性实验室或成像研究结果之间的相关程度不足以仅凭非侵入性研究预测肝铁含量。结论是,目前通常使用的计算机断层扫描或磁共振扫描在铁过载的常规评估中不具有成本效益,尽管这些成像程序可能在肝活检禁忌的患者中发挥作用。由于血清铁蛋白和转铁蛋白饱和度检测成本低且易于获得,它们仍然是铁过载首选的筛查研究。肝活检并进行定量铁测量仍然是血色素沉着症确诊的首选研究方法。