Suppr超能文献

CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc与CHADS(2)用于房颤低风险患者卒中风险评估:来自NCDR-PINNACLE注册研究单一中心的一项初步研究

CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc versus CHADS(2) for stroke risk assessment in low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: a pilot study from a single center of the NCDR-PINNACLE registry.

作者信息

Piyaskulkaew Chatchawan, Singh Tejwant, Szpunar Susan, Saravolatz Louis, Rosman Howard

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Wayne State University, 22101 Moross Road, 2nd Floor Cath Lab VEP, Detroit, MI, 48236, USA,

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014 May;37(4):400-3. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0983-z.

Abstract

The CHADS(2) score is widely used to assess the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with score of 0 and 1 are considered 'low risk' and are often treated with aspirin. In a Danish Study, the CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score was shown to identify low and high-risk subgroups among patients with CHADS(2) score of 0 and 1, with annual risk ranging from 0.84 to 8.18%. This study seeks to assess whether using CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score will identify high-risk subset of patients with low CHADS(2) scores in an American population. This pilot study examined data from our cardiology fellowship ambulatory clinics from January 2009 to May 2012 using the NCDR-PINNACLE registry. Each cardiology fellow entered patients' data using on-line software developed by the American College of Cardiology. Among 2,048 patients followed at our clinics, 478 had AF. Of those, 161 patients had CHADS(2) score of 0 (44 patients) or 1 (117 patients). Calculating the CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score in these patients, 12 (7.4%) had score of 0, 50 (31.1%) had score of 1, 66(41%) had score of 2, 31 (19.3%) had score of 3 and 2 (1.2%) had score of 4. Using original CHADS(2) recommendation, warfarin would not be strongly recommended in any of these patients. Utilizing the CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc score, 61.5% of the 161 patients would have a score of 2 or more signifying increased risk where anticoagulation may be indicated. Compared to CHADS(2), CHA(2)DS(2)--VASc may more precisely predict the risk of stroke and anticoagulation strategy in low-risk patients with non-valvular AF.

摘要

CHADS(2)评分被广泛用于评估心房颤动(AF)患者的中风风险。CHADS(2)评分为0和1的患者被视为“低风险”,通常采用阿司匹林治疗。在一项丹麦研究中,CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分被证明可在CHADS(2)评分为0和1的患者中识别出低风险和高风险亚组,其年风险范围为0.84%至8.18%。本研究旨在评估在美国人群中,使用CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分是否能识别出CHADS(2)评分低的高风险患者亚组。这项初步研究使用NCDR-PINNACLE登记系统,检查了2009年1月至2012年5月我们心脏病学进修门诊的患者数据。每位心脏病学进修医生使用美国心脏病学会开发的在线软件输入患者数据。在我们诊所随访的2048名患者中,478名患有AF。其中,161名患者的CHADS(2)评分为0(44名患者)或1(117名患者)。计算这些患者的CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分,12名(7.4%)评分为0,50名(31.1%)评分为1,66名(41%)评分为2,31名(19.3%)评分为3,2名(1.2%)评分为4。按照最初的CHADS(2)推荐,这些患者中没有任何一名会被强烈推荐使用华法林。利用CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc评分,161名患者中有61.5%的评分会达到2或更高,这表明风险增加,可能需要进行抗凝治疗。与CHADS(2)相比,CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc可能更精确地预测非瓣膜性AF低风险患者的中风风险和抗凝策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验