Fetal Medicine Unit, Division of Developmental Sciences, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;42(5):509-17. doi: 10.1002/uog.13194. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
The accuracy of prospective sonographic prenatal detection of invasive placentation is unclear. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the performance of ultrasound in at-risk women for prenatal identification of invasive placentation.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched using the search terms 'placenta accreta', 'placenta increta', 'placenta percreta', 'ultrasound', 'magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)', 'invasive placenta' and 'infiltrative placenta'. Two authors independently abstracted data from the articles. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and their 95% CIs for each study were calculated. Forest plots and summary receiver-operating characteristics curves were produced. Between-study heterogeneity was explored both graphically and statistically. The MOOSE (meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology) guidelines were followed.
Twenty-three studies involving 3707 pregnancies at risk for invasive placentation were included. The overall performance of ultrasound for the antenatal detection of invasive placentation was as follows: sensitivity, 90.72 (95% CI, 87.2-93.6)%; specificity, 96.94 (95% CI, 96.3-97.5)%; LR+, 11.01 (95% CI, 6.1-20.0); LR-, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.23); and DOR, 98.59 (95% CI, 48.8-199.0). Among the different ultrasound signs, color Doppler had the best predictive accuracy (sensitivity, 90.74 (95% CI, 85.2-94.7)%; specificity, 87.68 (95% CI, 84.6-90.4)%; LR+, 7.77 (95% CI, 3.3-18.4); LR-, 0.17 (95% CI, 0.10-0.29); and DOR, 69.02 (95% CI, 22.8-208.9)).
Ultrasound has a high accuracy for prenatal diagnosis of disorders of invasive placentation in high-risk women. The use of color Doppler improves the test performance.
前瞻性超声产前检测侵袭性胎盘的准确性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估超声在高危孕妇产前诊断侵袭性胎盘中的表现。
使用“胎盘植入”、“胎盘植入”、“胎盘穿透”、“超声”、“磁共振成像(MRI)”、“侵袭性胎盘”和“浸润性胎盘”等搜索词,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、疗效评价文摘数据库(DARE)和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)中进行检索。两位作者独立从文章中提取数据。计算每项研究的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比(LR+和 LR-)、诊断比值比(DOR)及其 95%CI。绘制森林图和汇总受试者工作特征曲线。通过图形和统计方法探索研究间的异质性。遵循 MOOSE(观察性研究的荟萃分析在流行病学)指南。
纳入了 23 项研究,共涉及 3707 例有侵袭性胎盘风险的妊娠。超声对产前侵袭性胎盘的总体表现如下:敏感性为 90.72%(95%CI,87.2-93.6);特异性为 96.94%(95%CI,96.3-97.5);LR+为 11.01(95%CI,6.1-20.0);LR-为 0.16(95%CI,0.11-0.23);DOR 为 98.59(95%CI,48.8-199.0)。在不同的超声征象中,彩色多普勒具有最佳的预测准确性(敏感性为 90.74%(95%CI,85.2-94.7);特异性为 87.68%(95%CI,84.6-90.4);LR+为 7.77(95%CI,3.3-18.4);LR-为 0.17(95%CI,0.10-0.29);DOR 为 69.02(95%CI,22.8-208.9))。
超声对高危孕妇侵袭性胎盘的产前诊断具有较高的准确性。使用彩色多普勒可提高检测性能。