Suppr超能文献

无创通气对再插管率的影响:一项心胸外科手术患者随机研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of non-invasive ventilation on reintubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised studies of patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

机构信息

San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):220-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) on the rate of reintubation among patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis of randomised trials.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials were searched (April 2012) for pertinent studies by two trained investigators. International experts were contacted.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles were assessed by two trained investigators, with divergences resolved by consensus. Inclusion criterion was random allocation to NIV versus standard treatment without restrictions on duration or modalities of the treatment delivered.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fourteen studies enrolling 1211 patients were included in the meta-analysis. NIV reduced the reintubation rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.16-0.53; P for efficacy < 0.0001; I2 = 0), hospital length of stay and mortality. Subgroup analyses suggested that the benefits of NIV are more important in patients with ongoing acute respiratory failure (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07-0.89) and in those at high risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications (RR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.84). Analyses including prophylactic studies in patients at low risk did not show a significant effect of NIV on reintubation rate (RR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.12-1.48) and on any of the outcomes considered except for oxygenation.

CONCLUSIONS

NIV seems to be effective in reducing reintubation rate after cardiothoracic surgery. The results of this meta-analysis should be confirmed by large randomised controlled studies.

摘要

目的

评估无创机械通气(NIV)对心胸外科手术后再次插管率的影响。

设计

随机试验的荟萃分析。

数据来源

通过两位训练有素的研究人员在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 临床试验中心注册库中检索(2012 年 4 月)相关研究,并联系国际专家。

数据提取

两位训练有素的研究人员评估文章,通过共识解决分歧。纳入标准为随机分配至 NIV 组与标准治疗组,不限制治疗的持续时间或方式。

数据综合

荟萃分析纳入了 14 项共 1211 例患者的研究。NIV 降低了再插管率(风险比 [RR],0.29;95%CI,0.16-0.53;P <0.0001;I2 = 0)、住院时间和死亡率。亚组分析表明,NIV 的益处对于持续急性呼吸衰竭的患者(RR,0.25;95%CI,0.07-0.89)和术后发生肺部并发症风险较高的患者(RR,0.19;95%CI,0.04-0.84)更为重要。包括低危患者预防性研究的分析显示,NIV 对再插管率(RR = 0.42;95%CI,0.12-1.48)以及除氧合以外的任何结果均无显著影响。

结论

NIV 似乎可有效降低心胸外科手术后的再插管率。这些荟萃分析的结果需要通过大型随机对照研究加以证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验