Prosser Michael, Sze Daniel
Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, The University of Hong Kong , Hong Kong , China and.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(1-2):131-42. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.820351. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
The aim of this article is to examine processes occurring within problem-based learning (PBL) courses (inside the black box) by contrasting these processes with outcome-based studies (from outside the black box). We review meta-analyses of input-output studies of PBL in comparison with traditional approaches and provide a summary of qualitative, phenomenographic and factor analytic analyses of student experiences when studying health sciences (dentistry and medicine) using PBL curricula. Results from meta-analyses showed PBL courses were preferred for the long-term retention of course content, short-term retention involving elaboration of new information and the application of clinical skills and reasoning. Traditional approaches were favoured for short-term retention of course content that did not require any elaboration. The qualitative studies reveal a diversity of student views about the concept of PBL pedagogy and approaches to learning in PBL curricula. They show that the ways in which students approach their studies in PBL in health sciences are closely related to how they conceive of PBL and that these dimensions are closely related to how the goals and standards of PBL courses are perceived.
本文的目的是通过将基于问题的学习(PBL)课程中的过程(黑箱内部)与基于结果的研究(黑箱外部)进行对比,来审视这些过程。我们回顾了与传统方法相比,PBL输入-输出研究的元分析,并总结了使用PBL课程学习健康科学(牙科和医学)时,学生体验的定性、现象学和因素分析。元分析结果表明,PBL课程更有利于课程内容的长期保留,而短期保留则涉及新信息的阐述以及临床技能和推理的应用。传统方法更有利于短期保留不需要任何阐述的课程内容。定性研究揭示了学生对PBL教学法概念以及PBL课程学习方法的多种观点。这些研究表明,健康科学领域的学生在PBL中进行学习的方式与他们对PBL的理解密切相关,并且这些维度与PBL课程的目标和标准的认知方式密切相关。