• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业治疗专业学生的学习风格及其在专业学术训练中的应用。

Occupational therapy students' learning styles and application to professional academic training.

作者信息

Titiloye Victoria Moji, Scott Anne Hiller

机构信息

Downstate Medical Center, Occupational Therapy Program, Brooklyn, NY, 11203.

出版信息

Occup Ther Health Care. 2002;15(1-2):145-55. doi: 10.1080/J003v15n01_14.

DOI:10.1080/J003v15n01_14
PMID:23944342
Abstract

SUMMARY Methods of optimizing students' learning have been a major concern of educators over time. If occupational therapy educators know the students' learning styles at the onset of their training, teaching can be designed to enhance students' optimal learning throughout their education. This study determined learning styles of 201 junior students (age range = 18-57, mean age = 30.9), enrolled in an urban occupational therapy program from 1990 to 1999. Kolb's Learning Style Inventory, a 12-item questionnaire, was administered to the students in the spring of their junior years. Their learning styles were determined using Kolb's criteria. Results yielded: variations in students' preferred learning styles in each class from year to year; higher percentage of convergers (mean = 35%), fewer divergers (mean = 18%). Overall, students were mostly convergers (mean = 35%) and assimilators (mean = 25%). Applications of the findings to teaching students are discussed.

摘要

摘要 长期以来,优化学生学习方法一直是教育工作者主要关注的问题。如果职业治疗教育工作者在学生培训开始时就了解他们的学习风格,那么就可以设计教学方法,以在整个教育过程中提高学生的最佳学习效果。本研究确定了1990年至1999年期间就读于城市职业治疗项目的201名大三学生(年龄范围=18 - 57岁,平均年龄=30.9岁)的学习风格。在大三学生的春季学期,对他们进行了科尔布学习风格量表测试,这是一份包含12个项目的问卷。根据科尔布的标准确定了他们的学习风格。结果显示:每年每个班级的学生偏好学习风格存在差异;聚合型学习者的比例较高(平均=35%),发散型学习者较少(平均=18%)。总体而言,学生大多是聚合型学习者(平均=35%)和同化型学习者(平均=25%)。本文讨论了这些研究结果在教学中的应用。

相似文献

1
Occupational therapy students' learning styles and application to professional academic training.职业治疗专业学生的学习风格及其在专业学术训练中的应用。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2002;15(1-2):145-55. doi: 10.1080/J003v15n01_14.
2
Assessing learning styles of Saudi dental students using Kolb's Learning Style Inventory.采用 Kolb 学习风格量表评估沙特牙科学生的学习风格。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Jun;78(6):927-33.
3
Learning styles of medical students change in relation to time.医学生的学习方式会随时间而改变。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Sep;35(3):307-11. doi: 10.1152/advan.00047.2011.
4
Assessing learning styles of medical students using Kolb's learning style inventory and their association with preferred teaching methodologies.评估医学生的学习风格:使用 Kolb 学习风格量表及其与偏好教学方法的关联。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Apr;71(4):1157-1161. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.1437.
5
Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory.本科护生和助产学新生学习风格的研究:利用 Kolb 学习风格量表的横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):506-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
Medical students' change in learning styles during the course of the undergraduate program: from 'thinking and watching' to 'thinking and doing'.医学生在本科课程学习过程中学习方式的转变:从“思考与观察”到“思考与实践”。
Can Med Educ J. 2012 Sep 30;3(2):e86-97. eCollection 2012.
7
Learning Style of Undergraduate Allied Health Students: clinical versus classroom.本科健康相关专业学生的学习风格:临床与课堂对比。
J Allied Health. 2013 Winter;42(4):223-8.
8
Learning styles of nurse anesthesia students related to level in a master of science in nursing program.护理麻醉专业硕士研究生的学习风格与课程水平的相关性
AANA J. 1994 Feb;62(1):39-45.
9
A multi-centre study of learning styles of new nursing students.一项针对新入职护理专业学生学习风格的多中心研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jan;31(1-2):111-120. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15888. Epub 2021 May 30.
10
Differences in medical student performance on examinations: exploring score variance between Kolb's Learning Style Inventory classifications.医学生考试成绩差异:探索柯尔布学习风格量表分类之间的分数差异。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02353-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effective clinical supervision of allied health professionals: a mixed methods study.有效临床监督的辅助卫生专业人员:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 31;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4873-8.