• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本科健康相关专业学生的学习风格:临床与课堂对比。

Learning Style of Undergraduate Allied Health Students: clinical versus classroom.

作者信息

Cox Lisa, Clutter Jill, Sergakis Georgianna, Harris Laura

机构信息

The Ohio State University, 306 Atwell Hall, 453 W 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Tel 614-688-3811, fax 614-292-0210.

出版信息

J Allied Health. 2013 Winter;42(4):223-8.

PMID:24326919
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recognizing and valuing the diversity of student learning and learning styles allow educators to construct more effective and efficient teaching methods and create mutually beneficial learning environments.

METHODS

Kolb(s Learning Style Inventories (LSI) were administered to 82 seniors enrolled in a School of Allied Health at a large midwestern university. The students completed LSI in relation to both their didactic and clinical coursework. Sets of instruments were matched and evaluated using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, in the didactic classroom setting, 24.2% (n=16) of the students were divergers, 28.8% (n=19) were accommodators, 19.4% (n=13) were convergers, and 27.3% (n=18) were assimilators. In the clinical settings, 27.8% (n=20) of the students were divergers, 36.1% (n=26) were accommodators, 23.6% (n=17) were convergers, and only 12.5% (n=9) were assimilators. Learning style did change for 66.7% (n=10) of athletic training majors. Over half of the students in medical dietetics, radiological sciences, and respiratory therapy LSIs did not change from classroom to clinical.

CONCLUSION

The diverse nature of the students' preferences reinforces the need for various teaching strategies. Both the students and the educators need to work cooperatively to maximize the balance of the learning environment and make meaning of the educational experience.

摘要

背景

认识并重视学生学习及学习风格的多样性,有助于教育工作者构建更有效且高效的教学方法,并营造互利的学习环境。

方法

对一所大型中西部大学健康科学学院的82名大四学生进行了科尔布学习风格量表(LSI)测试。学生们针对理论课程和临床课程完成了LSI测试。使用描述性统计方法对多组测试工具进行匹配和评估。

结果

总体而言,在理论课堂环境中,24.2%(n = 16)的学生为发散型学习者,28.8%(n = 19)为顺应型学习者,19.4%(n = 13)为聚合型学习者,27.3%(n = 18)为同化型学习者。在临床环境中,27.8%(n = 20)的学生为发散型学习者,36.1%(n = 26)为顺应型学习者,23.6%(n = 17)为聚合型学习者,只有12.5%(n = 9)为同化型学习者。66.7%(n = 10)的运动训练专业学生的学习风格发生了变化。医学营养学、放射科学和呼吸治疗专业的LSI测试中,超过半数的学生从课堂到临床学习风格未发生变化。

结论

学生偏好的多样性凸显了采用多种教学策略的必要性。学生和教育工作者都需要合作,以最大限度地平衡学习环境,并理解教育体验的意义。

相似文献

1
Learning Style of Undergraduate Allied Health Students: clinical versus classroom.本科健康相关专业学生的学习风格:临床与课堂对比。
J Allied Health. 2013 Winter;42(4):223-8.
2
A Nationwide Learning-Style Assessment of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students in CAAHEP-Accredited Athletic Training Programs.对美国高等院校健康与体育教育认证委员会(CAAHEP)认证的运动训练专业本科学生的全国性学习风格评估。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S141-S146.
3
Learning styles of undergraduate nutrition and dietetics students.本科营养与饮食学专业学生的学习风格。
J Allied Health. 2012 Winter;41(4):170-6.
4
Assessing learning styles of Saudi dental students using Kolb's Learning Style Inventory.采用 Kolb 学习风格量表评估沙特牙科学生的学习风格。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Jun;78(6):927-33.
5
Do general practitioners' risk-taking propensities and learning styles influence their continuing medical education preferences?全科医生的冒险倾向和学习风格会影响他们对继续医学教育的偏好吗?
Med Teach. 2002 Jan;24(1):71-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590120091078.
6
The relation of dental students' learning styles to their satisfaction with traditional and inverted classroom models.牙科学员的学习风格与他们对传统课堂和翻转课堂模式满意度的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1749-x.
7
Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory.本科护生和助产学新生学习风格的研究:利用 Kolb 学习风格量表的横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):506-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
8
Learning style preferences of Australian health science students.澳大利亚健康科学专业学生的学习风格偏好。
J Allied Health. 2010 Summer;39(2):95-103.
9
Occupational therapy students' learning styles and application to professional academic training.职业治疗专业学生的学习风格及其在专业学术训练中的应用。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2002;15(1-2):145-55. doi: 10.1080/J003v15n01_14.
10
Learning styles of medical students change in relation to time.医学生的学习方式会随时间而改变。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Sep;35(3):307-11. doi: 10.1152/advan.00047.2011.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Learning Style on Medical Students' Satisfaction With Hands-On Procedural Training.学习风格对医学生实践操作培训满意度的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 8;17(7):e87543. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87543. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review.物理治疗师的学习风格:系统范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1434-5.