• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂腹壁重建:结果回顾

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review.

作者信息

Henry Cathy R, Bradburn Eric, Moyer Kurtis E

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Penn State University, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep;71(3):266-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828a49f9.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828a49f9
PMID:23945531
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) remains challenging. Techniques for repair are numerous and include primary fascial approximation, separation of components (SOC), and use of various biologic and synthetic meshes. Given the vast expanse of available techniques and lack of consistent algorithms, an analysis of outcomes in AWR is presented.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of complex AWRs performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution from July 2008 to October of 2011. Outcome differences for hernia repairs specifically addressing SOC with an acellular dermis inlay (retrorectus), underlay, or overlay mesh, as well as interposition biologic mesh placement were included.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were identified. The average body mass index in this population was 35.5 kg/m. The average age was 53.7 years, with 62% females and 38% males. The overall rate of tobacco use history was 48%. Twenty-eight percent were diabetic. The overall hernia recurrence rate was 16%. Patients having SOC with inlay (retrorectus) mesh had a hernia recurrence rate of 9%. Hernia recurrence in those with SOC and biologic mesh reinforcement as an underlay or onlay was 12%; in those without mesh reinforcement, 22%; and for those with a biologic mesh interposition, 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review show that hernia recurrence rates are decreased with primary fascial repair. Further reduction occurs when biologic mesh reinforcement is used. The lowest recurrence rates were seen in the group with SOC and a porcine biologic mesh inlay. Abdominal wall reconstruction is challenging and with continued outcomes review a refined algorithm can be achieved.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic: III.

摘要

背景

复杂腹壁重建(AWR)仍然具有挑战性。修复技术众多,包括原发性筋膜缝合、成分分离术(SOC)以及使用各种生物和合成补片。鉴于可用技术种类繁多且缺乏一致的算法,本文对AWR的治疗结果进行分析。

方法

对2008年7月至2011年10月在单一机构由2名外科医生实施的复杂AWR进行回顾性研究。纳入了采用脱细胞真皮植入(腹直肌后)、底层或覆盖补片专门处理SOC的疝修补术以及置入生物补片的结果差异。

结果

共纳入66例患者。该人群的平均体重指数为35.5kg/m²。平均年龄为53.7岁,女性占62%,男性占38%。有吸烟史的总体比例为48%。28%为糖尿病患者。总体疝复发率为16%。采用植入(腹直肌后)补片的SOC患者疝复发率为9%。采用底层或覆盖生物补片加强的SOC患者疝复发率为12%;未使用补片加强的患者为22%;采用生物补片置入的患者为40%。

结论

本综述结果表明,原发性筋膜修复可降低疝复发率。使用生物补片加强可进一步降低复发率。SOC联合猪生物补片植入组的复发率最低。腹壁重建具有挑战性,通过持续的结果评估可实现更完善的算法。

临床问题/证据级别:治疗性:III级。

相似文献

1
Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcomes review.复杂腹壁重建:结果回顾
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Sep;71(3):266-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828a49f9.
2
Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair.生物补片用于清洁-污染和污染性腹疝修补术中腹壁重建的疗效分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Aug;75(2):201-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000030.
3
Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.复杂腹壁重建联合成分离术及猪脱细胞真皮基质强化后的适应证及治疗结果
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):394-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822f997b.
4
Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.与桥接生物补片修复腹壁重建相比,采用生物补片加强的一期筋膜闭合术并发症和复发率更低:一项倾向评分分析。
Surgery. 2017 Feb;161(2):499-508. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction.原发性筋膜闭合联合网片加强在腹壁重建中优于桥接网片修复。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
6
Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction.单机构使用生物补片进行腹壁重建的经验。
Am J Surg. 2014 Sep;208(3):480-4; discussion 483-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.020. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
7
Outcomes of abdominal wall reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix are not affected by wound contamination.使用脱细胞真皮基质进行腹壁重建的结果不受伤口污染的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov;219(5):853-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.06.021. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
8
Abdominal wall reconstruction: a case series of ventral hernia repair using the component separation technique with biologic mesh.腹壁重建:采用生物补片的腹部分离技术修复腹疝的病例系列。
Am J Surg. 2013 Mar;205(3):322-7; discussion 327-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.024. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
9
A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh.利用生物补片进行一期修复感染和污染的腹壁缺损的 5 年临床经验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):991-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182849871.
10
The use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in a bridge technique for complex abdominal wall reconstruction: an outcome analysis.猪脱细胞真皮基质在复杂腹壁重建桥接技术中的应用:结果分析。
Am J Surg. 2013 Feb;205(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.031. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterolateral thigh flaps in closing large abdominal wall defect after the resection of mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report.前外侧大腿皮瓣在黏液性腺癌切除术后关闭大的腹壁缺损中的应用:病例报告。
BMC Surg. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01550-x.
2
Abdominal wall reconstruction following resection of large abdominal aggressive neoplasms using tensor fascia lata flap with or without mesh reinforcement.使用阔筋膜张肌皮瓣并辅以或不辅以补片加强,对大型腹部侵袭性肿瘤切除术后进行腹壁重建。
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):333-341. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1738-8. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
3
What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?
在腹壁重建中使用生物或生物合成补片的证据有哪些?
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):249-269. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1735-y. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Nomenclature in Abdominal Wall Hernias: Is It Time for Consensus?腹壁疝的命名:是时候达成共识了吗?
World J Surg. 2017 Oct;41(10):2488-2491. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4037-0.
5
Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects.在开放性修复巨大中线腹疝缺损时,采用猪脱细胞真皮加强的成分分离术优于传统的桥接补片修补术。
Am Surg. 2014 Aug;80(8):725-31.
6
Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status.猪真皮植入物在软组织重建中的现状
Biologics. 2014 Mar 10;8:83-90. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S46469. eCollection 2014.