Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.V.D, D.C.D, C.A.A, V.R.V.); Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (C.V.D, P.A.F., M.J.A, S.J.A.); Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (A.N.); Mayo Medical School, Rochester, MN (N.A.P.); Mayo Graduate School of Medicine Visiting Scholars Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (S.B.); Department of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (J.P.S., D.O.H.); Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (M.J.A., S.J.A.); and Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (A.A.R.).
Circulation. 2013 Sep 24;128(13):1433-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003540. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
A patent foramen ovale (PFO) may permit arterial embolization of thrombi that accumulate on the leads of cardiac implantable electronic devices in the right-sided cardiac chambers. We sought to determine whether a PFO increases the risk of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with endocardial leads.
We retrospectively evaluated all patients who had endocardial leads implanted between January 1, 2000, and October 25, 2010, at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Echocardiography was used to establish definite PFO and non-PFO cohorts. The primary end point of stroke/TIA consistent with a cardioembolic etiology and the secondary end point of mortality during postimplantation follow-up were compared in PFO versus non-PFO patients with the use of Cox proportional hazards models. We analyzed 6075 patients (364 with PFO) followed for a mean 4.7 ± 3.1 years. The primary end point of stroke/TIA was met in 30/364 (8.2%) PFO versus 117/5711 (2.0%) non-PFO patients (hazard ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.33-5.25; P<0.0001). The association of PFO with stroke/TIA remained significant after multivariable adjustment for age, sex, history of stroke/TIA, atrial fibrillation, and baseline aspirin/warfarin use (hazard ratio, 3.30; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-4.96; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between PFO and non-PFO patients (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.07; P=0.25).
In patients with endocardial leads, the presence of a PFO on routine echocardiography is associated with a substantially increased risk of embolic stroke/TIA. This finding suggests a role of screening for PFOs in patients who require cardiac implantable electronic devices; if a PFO is detected, PFO closure, anticoagulation, or nonvascular lead placement may be considered.
卵圆孔未闭(PFO)可能允许在右心腔的心脏植入式电子设备导线上聚集的血栓发生动脉栓塞。我们试图确定 PFO 是否会增加心内膜导联患者发生中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的风险。
我们回顾性评估了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 10 月 25 日期间在梅奥诊所罗切斯特院区植入心内膜导联的所有患者。使用超声心动图确定明确的 PFO 和非 PFO 队列。使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较 PFO 与非 PFO 患者的中风/TIA 主要终点(符合心源性栓塞病因)和植入后随访期间的死亡率次要终点。我们分析了 6075 例患者(364 例有 PFO),平均随访 4.7±3.1 年。30/364(8.2%)PFO 患者和 117/5711(2.0%)非 PFO 患者发生中风/TIA 主要终点(风险比,3.49;95%置信区间,2.33-5.25;P<0.0001)。多变量调整年龄、性别、中风/TIA 史、心房颤动和基线阿司匹林/华法林使用后,PFO 与中风/TIA 的关联仍然显著(风险比,3.30;95%置信区间,2.19-4.96;P<0.0001)。PFO 与非 PFO 患者的全因死亡率无显著差异(风险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.77-1.07;P=0.25)。
在有心内膜导联的患者中,常规超声心动图上存在 PFO 与栓塞性中风/TIA 的风险显著增加相关。这一发现表明在需要心脏植入式电子设备的患者中筛查 PFO 的作用;如果发现 PFO,可以考虑 PFO 闭合、抗凝或非血管导联放置。