Dittmer J, Bennett M
Transplantation. 1975 Apr;19(4):295-301. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197504000-00004.
To test the hypothesis that hemopoietic cells within a tissue graft are responsible for its immunogenicity, two experimental protocols were followed. LEW hearts were grafted into (LEW X BN)F-1 host rats and LEW or F-1 lymphocytes were injected into the apex of the grafted heart. The LEW but not the F-1 cells induced a local reaction, apparently because the circulating F-1 cells were the necessary immunogens. The second protocol took advantage of the knowledge that lethally irradiated LEW rats were able to reject WF Ag-B-incompatible hemopoietic cells (but not tissue allografts) within a few days. LEW rats were lethally irradiated and grafted with WF hearts on day 0. A mixture of LEW marrow, thymus, spleen and lymph node cells, or marrow cells only were infused either on day 0 or day 2. Cardiac allografts in hosts repopulated with the mixture of lymphoid cells survived a mean of 11.3 days in hosts infused on day 0, but survived indefinitely if the lymphoid cells were infused on day 2. The 2-day interval also prolonged the survival of allografts in rats infused with only marrow cells. The long-term recipients, without any further treatment, rejected WF skin grafts as first-set reactions 1 year later but did not reject second WF cardiac allografts. Lymphoid cells from long-term recipients imparied the rejection of WF cardiac allografts by LEW host rats. The lack of rejection of the original cardiac allograft supported the hypothesis tested. Certain hemopoietic cells responsible for the immunogenicity of cardiac allografts were probably eliminated in the 2-day interval at least in part by host effector cells capable of rejecting allogeneic hemopoietic cells. However, the mechanism of long-term "unresponsiveness" to WF hearts could have been caused by loss of accessory cells during the 2-day interval followed by infusion of immunocompetent cells. Skin rejections in these recipients may have been attributable to reactions against skin differentiation-specific antigens.
为了验证组织移植物中的造血细胞是其免疫原性的原因这一假设,采用了两种实验方案。将LEW大鼠的心脏移植到(LEW×BN)F-1宿主大鼠体内,并将LEW或F-1淋巴细胞注射到移植心脏的顶端。LEW细胞而非F-1细胞引发了局部反应,显然是因为循环的F-1细胞是必需的免疫原。第二个方案利用了这样一个知识,即经致死剂量照射的LEW大鼠能够在几天内排斥与WF Ag-B不相容的造血细胞(但不排斥组织同种异体移植物)。在第0天,对LEW大鼠进行致死剂量照射并移植WF心脏。在第0天或第2天注入LEW骨髓、胸腺、脾脏和淋巴结细胞的混合物,或仅注入骨髓细胞。在第0天注入淋巴细胞混合物的宿主中,重新填充有淋巴细胞混合物的宿主中的心脏同种异体移植物平均存活11.3天,但如果在第2天注入淋巴细胞,则可无限期存活。2天的间隔也延长了仅注入骨髓细胞的大鼠中同种异体移植物的存活时间。长期接受者在没有任何进一步治疗的情况下,1年后作为初次反应排斥了WF皮肤移植物,但没有排斥第二次WF心脏同种异体移植物。长期接受者的淋巴细胞损害了LEW宿主大鼠对WF心脏同种异体移植物的排斥。对原始心脏同种异体移植物缺乏排斥支持了所验证的假设。负责心脏同种异体移植物免疫原性的某些造血细胞可能在2天的间隔内至少部分被能够排斥同种异体造血细胞的宿主效应细胞清除。然而,对WF心脏长期“无反应性”的机制可能是由于在2天间隔期间辅助细胞的丢失,随后注入了免疫活性细胞。这些接受者中的皮肤排斥可能归因于针对皮肤分化特异性抗原的反应。