Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland , 20 Penn Street HSFII, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
J Phys Chem B. 2013 Sep 12;117(36):10572-80. doi: 10.1021/jp4061889. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
A comparative study on aqueous methanol solutions modeled by the CHARMM additive and Drude polarizable force fields was carried out by employing Kirkwood-Buff analysis. It was shown that both models reproduced the experimental Kirkwood-Buff integrals and excess coordination numbers adequately well over the entire concentration range. The Drude model showed significant improvement over the additive model in solution densities, partial molar volumes, excess molar volumes, concentration-dependent diffusion constants, and dielectric constants. However, the additive model performed somewhat better than the Drude model in reproducing the activity derivative, excess molar Gibbs energy, and excess molar enthalpy of mixing. This is due to the additive achieving a better balance among solute-solute, solute-solvent, and solvent-solvent interactions, indicating the potential for improvements in the Drude polarizable alcohol model.
采用 Kirkwood-Buff 分析方法对 CHARMM 加和与 Drude 极化力场模拟的甲醇水混合体系进行了对比研究。结果表明,两种模型均能很好地再现整个浓度范围内的实验 Kirkwood-Buff 积分和过剩配位数。与加和模型相比,Drude 模型在溶液密度、偏摩尔体积、过量摩尔体积、浓度依赖性扩散常数和介电常数方面有显著改善。然而,加和模型在再现活度导数、过剩摩尔 Gibbs 自由能和混合过剩摩尔焓方面的表现要好于 Drude 模型。这是由于加和模型在溶质-溶质、溶质-溶剂和溶剂-溶剂相互作用之间取得了更好的平衡,表明 Drude 极化醇模型具有改进的潜力。