At the time of the study, the authors were with the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1557-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301403. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
We evaluated the efficacy of a motivational tobacco cessation treatment combined with nicotine replacement relative to usual care initiated in inpatient psychiatry.
We randomized participants (n = 224; 79% recruitment rate) recruited from a locked acute psychiatry unit with a 100% smoking ban to intervention or usual care. Prior to hospitalization, participants averaged 19 (SD = 12) cigarettes per day; only 16% intended to quit smoking in the next 30 days. Results. Verified smoking 7-day point prevalence abstinence was significantly higher for intervention than usual care at month 3 (13.9% vs 3.2%), 6 (14.4% vs 6.5%), 12 (19.4% vs 10.9%), and 18 (20.0% vs 7.7%; odds ratio [OR] = 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22, 8.14; P = .018; retention > 80%). Psychiatric measures did not predict abstinence; measures of motivation and tobacco dependence did. The usual care group had a significantly greater likelihood than the intervention group of psychiatric rehospitalization (adjusted OR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.06, 3.49).
The findings support initiation of motivationally tailored tobacco cessation treatment during acute psychiatric hospitalization. Psychiatric severity did not moderate treatment efficacy, and cessation treatment appeared to decrease rehospitalization risk, perhaps by providing broader therapeutic benefit.
我们评估了将动机性戒烟治疗与尼古丁替代疗法相结合与常规护理相结合,在住院精神病学中进行的效果。
我们随机招募了参与者(n=224;79%的招募率),这些参与者来自一个有 100%禁烟令的上锁的急性精神病病房。参与者在住院前平均每天吸烟 19(SD=12)支;只有 16%的人打算在接下来的 30 天内戒烟。结果。在 3 个月(13.9%对 3.2%)、6 个月(14.4%对 6.5%)、12 个月(19.4%对 10.9%)和 18 个月(20.0%对 7.7%)时,干预组的经验证的 7 天点吸烟率显著高于常规护理组(优势比[OR]=3.15;95%置信区间[CI]:1.22,8.14;P=.018;保留率>80%)。精神科措施不能预测戒烟;而动机和烟草依赖的措施可以预测。与干预组相比,常规护理组更有可能因精神科重新住院(调整后的 OR=1.92;95%CI:1.06,3.49)。
这些发现支持在急性精神病住院期间开始进行针对性的戒烟治疗。精神科严重程度并未缓和治疗效果,而戒烟治疗似乎降低了重新住院的风险,这可能是因为提供了更广泛的治疗效益。