• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修改后的 Timeline Followback 的因子结构:一种衡量酒精相关后果的方法。

Factor structure of the modified Timeline Followback: a measure of alcohol-related consequences.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 Sep;74(5):803-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.803.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2013.74.803
PMID:23948541
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Knowledge of the types of consequences assessed by a given measure of alcohol-related consequences is important, as it may affect how the scores from that measure relate to individual differences and how the measure is used in treatment. This study was designed to examine the factor structure of the modified Timeline Followback (TLFB).

METHOD

Undergraduate students (n = 573; 68.9% female) who drank alcohol at least once in the past 30 days completed an online version of the modified TLFB, a measure of alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences.

RESULTS

A confirmatory factor analysis supported the previously proposed four-factor structure of the consequences assessed by the modified TLFB (i.e., personal, social, role functioning, and physical consequences). Internal consistency of the four categories, as assessed by deleted-item odds ratios, was good. Additionally, correlations between subscale scores and measures of alcohol use provided evidence of convergent validity, and intraclass correlations between two administration formats (online vs. in-person) indicated preliminary concurrent validity of the four factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study found support for the factor structure that was previously proposed by Norberg et al. Both the results of the confirmatory factor analysis and the deleted-item odds ratios indicate that most items fit the model well. Four items, however, could not be included in the model as a result of either low endorsement or poor fit, suggesting that further research on these items is needed.

摘要

目的

了解特定酒精相关后果评估量表所评估的后果类型很重要,因为这可能会影响该测量得分与个体差异的关系,以及该测量在治疗中的使用方式。本研究旨在检验改良时间线回溯(TLFB)的因子结构。

方法

在过去 30 天内至少喝过一次酒的本科生(n = 573;女性占 68.9%)完成了改良 TLFB 的在线版本,这是一种评估饮酒和与酒精相关后果的测量工具。

结果

验证性因子分析支持改良 TLFB 评估的后果的先前提出的四因素结构(即个人、社交、角色功能和身体后果)。通过删除项目的优势比评估的四个类别的内部一致性良好。此外,子量表得分与饮酒测量之间的相关性提供了收敛有效性的证据,两种管理格式(在线与面对面)之间的组内相关系数表明了四个因素的初步同时有效性。

结论

总的来说,本研究支持了 Norberg 等人先前提出的因子结构。验证性因子分析的结果和删除项目的优势比都表明,大多数项目都很好地符合模型。然而,由于低认可度或较差的拟合度,有四个项目无法纳入模型,这表明需要对这些项目进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the modified Timeline Followback: a measure of alcohol-related consequences.修改后的 Timeline Followback 的因子结构:一种衡量酒精相关后果的方法。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 Sep;74(5):803-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.803.
2
A within-subjects validation of a group-administered timeline followback for alcohol use.团体施测的酒精使用时间线追溯法的被试内效度验证
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):332-5. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.332.
3
Is the pregame to blame? Event-level associations between pregaming and alcohol-related consequences.是赛前活动导致的吗?赛前活动与酒精相关后果的事件级关联。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2013 Sep;74(5):757-64. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.757.
4
Validation of a multisubstance online Timeline Followback assessment.多物质在线 Timeline Followback 评估的验证。
Brain Behav. 2020 Jan;10(1):e01486. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1486. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
A group-administered Timeline Followback assessment of alcohol use.一项针对酒精使用情况的团体管理时间线回溯评估。
J Stud Alcohol. 2005 Sep;66(5):693-7. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.693.
6
Modeling the severity of drinking consequences in first-year college women: an item response theory analysis of the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index.运用项目反应理论分析罗格斯酒精问题指数模型对大一女大学生饮酒后果严重程度的评估。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Nov;72(6):981-90. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2011.72.981.
7
Development and preliminary validation of the young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire.青年成人酒精后果问卷的编制与初步验证
J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jan;67(1):169-77. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.169.
8
The psychometric properties of a shortened Dutch version of the consequences scale used in the Core Alcohol and Drug Survey.核心酒精与药物调查中使用的后果量表荷兰语简版的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):e0187876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187876. eCollection 2017.
9
The factor structure of a dichotomously scored Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index.二分计分的罗格斯酒精问题指数的因子结构。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):597-606. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.597.
10
Alcohol assessment using wireless handheld computers: a pilot study.使用无线手持计算机进行酒精评估:一项试点研究。
Addict Behav. 2007 Dec;32(12):3065-70. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health and depression in adults presenting to the emergency department: Implications for family medicine.成年人就诊于急诊科的健康社会决定因素与抑郁:对家庭医学的启示。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Dec;67(12):e337-e347. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6712e337.
2
People's reasons for wanting to complete probation: Use and predictive validity in an e-health intervention.人们希望完成缓刑的原因:电子健康干预中的使用情况及预测效度。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Apr;61:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
3
Gender matters: the relationship between social anxiety and alcohol-related consequences.
性别很重要:社交焦虑与酒精相关后果之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115361. eCollection 2014.