Primal Health Research Centre, 72 Savernake Road, London NW3 2JR, UK.
Med Hypotheses. 2013 Nov;81(5):889-91. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Synthetic oxytocin is widely used in developed countries and in emerging countries as well. It is the most common medical intervention in childbirth. A great variety of side effects are plausible. There are in particular theoretical reasons to test the hypothesis that the increasing incidence of breastfeeding difficulties and the frequent earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding are related to the use of synthetic oxytocin during labour. There have already been some studies that tend to support this hypothesis. Four hundred of the 7465 children born in 2006 at the Carlos Haya University Hospital (Malaga, Spain) were randomly selected. By interviewing the mothers, information about feeding type and duration was obtained in 2011 for 316 children. Among the 189 children who were born after labours induced or augmented with synthetic oxytocin, the odds ratio for bottle-feeding was 1.451 and the odds ratio for withdrawal at 3 months was 2.294. In addition, the Battelle Developmental Inventory was used to assess at age five 148 children (84 born with synthetic oxytocin): the odds ratio for neuropsychological development disorders after use of oxytocin was 1.46. The main limitation of such a preliminary study is that in the context of a tertiary Spanish hospital the possible effects of synthetic oxytocin on the quality and duration of breastfeeding cannot be easily dissociated from the effects of other components of pharmacological assistance during labour, particularly epidural fentanyl (a synthetic opioid analgesic). This comment is valid for all studies exploring the side effects of synthetic oxytocin in obstetric units of developed countries, including explorations through videotapes of the effects of synthetic oxytocin on primitive neonatal reflexes. It is also valid for studies exploring the side effects of obstetric analgesia without taking into account the use of synthetic oxytocin. This is why we underline the importance of conducting such studies in emerging countries (e.g. China and Brazil) where synthetic oxytocin is widely used while there are no epidural services. Studies of oxytocin given electively at the onset of third stage of labour (after the birth of the neonate) should help to interpret possible effects on the quality and duration of breastfeeding.
合成催产素在发达国家和新兴国家都被广泛应用。它是分娩中最常见的医疗干预措施。有各种各样的可能的副作用。特别是有理论上的理由来检验这样的假设,即母乳喂养困难的发生率增加和母乳喂养经常比预期更早地停止,与分娩过程中使用合成催产素有关系。已经有一些研究倾向于支持这一假设。2006 年,在西班牙马拉加的卡洛斯·哈亚大学医院(Carlos Haya University Hospital)出生的 7465 名儿童中,随机选择了 400 名。通过对母亲进行访谈,在 2011 年获得了 316 名儿童的喂养类型和持续时间信息。在 189 名出生于使用合成催产素诱导或增强分娩的儿童中,奶瓶喂养的比值比为 1.451,3 个月时停止母乳喂养的比值比为 2.294。此外,还使用了巴特尔发展量表(Battelle Developmental Inventory)评估了 148 名儿童(84 名出生时使用了合成催产素)在 5 岁时的神经心理发育障碍:使用催产素后发生神经心理发育障碍的比值比为 1.46。这种初步研究的主要局限性在于,在西班牙一家三级医院的背景下,合成催产素对母乳喂养的质量和持续时间的可能影响,不能轻易地与分娩过程中其他药物辅助手段的影响分开,特别是硬膜外芬太尼(一种合成阿片类镇痛药)。这一评论适用于所有探索发达国家产科单位中合成催产素副作用的研究,包括通过合成催产素对原始新生儿反射影响的录像带进行探索。它也适用于探索产科镇痛的副作用而不考虑使用合成催产素的研究。这就是为什么我们强调在新兴国家(如中国和巴西)开展此类研究的重要性,因为在这些国家广泛使用合成催产素,而没有硬膜外服务。在第三产程开始时(新生儿出生后)选择性给予催产素的研究应该有助于解释对母乳喂养质量和持续时间的可能影响。