Suppr超能文献

社区获得性肺炎治疗团队可缩短住院的低风险肺炎患者的住院时间。

Community-acquired pneumonia team decreases length of stay in hospitalized, low-risk patients with pneumonia.

作者信息

Marcos Pedro J, Restrepo Marcos I, Sanjuàn Pilar, Ferreira-Gonzalez Lucía, Verea-Hernando Héctor

机构信息

Pulmonary Medicine Department, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.

出版信息

Hosp Pract (1995). 2013 Aug;41(3):7-14. doi: 10.3810/hp.2013.08.1063.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Team-focused intervention to improve the care of low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a matter of controversy. Our aim was to determine if a community-acquired pneumonia team (CAPT) would shorten hospital length of stay (LOS) and improve health care utilization in low-risk patients with CAP compared with management by a general pulmonary team (GPT).

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study of hospitalized, low-risk patients with CAP (Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI] score class I or II) at a single tertiary hospital from June 2007 to June 2008. Study patients were stratified to management by the CAPT treating group (n = 35), following the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) CAP guideline recommendations, or to management by the GPT (n = 30) following the standard of care. Primary outcome measure for comparison of the efficacy of the 2 different team-focused interventions was hospital LOS for patients with CAP. Secondary study outcome measures included patient 30- and 90-day all-cause readmission rate, rate of mortality at 30 and 90 days, antibiotic-treatment duration, time to switch patient from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotic treatment, and time to achieve clinical stability for patients.

RESULTS

Hospitalized, low-risk patients with CAP, who were assisted by a CAPT were more likely to have a shorter hospital stay (9 days less; P < 0.001), shorter time to switch from IV to oral antibiotic therapy (8 days less; P <0.001), and total shorter duration of antibiotic treatment (6 days less; P <0.001), when compared with low-risk patients with CAP who were assisted by a GPT. In addition, for both groups of assisted patients, there were no differences in the time to achieve clinical stability, use of guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy, rate of mortality, or rate of readmissions at 30 and 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Management by a dedicated CAPT reduced patient hospital LOS, time to switch from IV to oral antibiotic therapy, and duration of antibiotic treatment, without causing adverse events, compared with standard of care, in low-risk patients with CAP.

摘要

背景

以团队为中心的干预措施来改善社区获得性肺炎(CAP)低风险患者的护理存在争议。我们的目的是确定与普通肺科团队(GPT)管理相比,社区获得性肺炎团队(CAPT)是否能缩短低风险CAP患者的住院时间(LOS)并改善医疗资源利用情况。

方法

我们于2007年6月至2008年6月在一家三级医院对住院的低风险CAP患者(肺炎严重程度指数[PSI]评分I或II级)进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。研究患者被分层为接受CAPT治疗组管理(n = 35),遵循美国传染病学会(IDSA)和美国胸科学会(ATS)的CAP指南建议,或接受GPT管理(n = 30),遵循护理标准。比较两种不同以团队为中心干预措施疗效的主要结局指标是CAP患者的住院LOS。次要研究结局指标包括患者30天和90天全因再入院率、30天和90天死亡率、抗生素治疗持续时间、患者从静脉(IV)抗生素治疗转换为口服抗生素治疗的时间以及患者达到临床稳定的时间。

结果

与接受GPT协助的低风险CAP患者相比,接受CAPT协助的住院低风险CAP患者更有可能住院时间更短(少9天;P < 0.001)、从IV抗生素治疗转换为口服抗生素治疗的时间更短(少8天;P < 0.001)以及抗生素治疗总持续时间更短(少6天;P < 0.001)。此外,对于两组受协助患者,在达到临床稳定的时间、使用符合指南的抗生素治疗、死亡率或30天和90天再入院率方面没有差异。

结论

与护理标准相比,在低风险CAP患者中,由专门的CAPT进行管理可缩短患者住院LOS、从IV抗生素治疗转换为口服抗生素治疗的时间以及抗生素治疗持续时间,且不会引起不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验