Marcos Pedro J, Restrepo Marcos I, González-Barcala Francisco J, Soni Nilam J, Vidal Iria, Sanjuàn Pilar, Llinares Diego, Ferreira-Gonzalez Lucía, Rábade Carlos, Otero-González Isabel, Marcos Pedro, Verea-Hernando Héctor
Servicio de Neumología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital, and University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(6):1538-1546. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.44.
The relationship between clinical judgment and the pneumonia severity index (PSI) score in deciding the site of care for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has not been well investigated. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical factors that influence decision-making to hospitalize low-risk patients (PSI ≤2) with CAP.
An observational, prospective, multicenter study of consecutive CAP patients was performed at five hospitals in Spain. Patients admitted with CAP and a PSI ≤2 were identified. Admitting physicians completed a patient-specific survey to identify the clinical factors influencing the decision to admit a patient. The reason for admission was categorized into 1 of 6 categories. We also assessed whether the reason for admission was associated with poorer clinical outcomes [intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 30-day mortality or readmission].
One hundred and fifty-five hospitalized patients were enrolled. Two or more reasons for admission were seen in 94 patients (60.6%), including abnormal clinical test results (60%), signs of clinical deterioration (43.2%), comorbid conditions (28.4%), psychosocial factors (28.4%), suspected H1N1 pneumonia (20.6%), and recent visit to the emergency department (ED) in the past 2 weeks (7.7%). Signs of clinical deterioration and abnormal clinical test results were associated with poorer clinical outcomes (P<0.005).
Low-risk patients with CAP and a PSI ≤2 are admitted to the hospital for multiple reasons. Abnormal clinical test results and signs of clinical deterioration are two specific reasons for admission that are associated with poorer clinical outcomes in low risk CAP patients.
在决定社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者的护理地点时,临床判断与肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)评分之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是确定影响低风险CAP患者(PSI≤2)住院决策的临床因素。
在西班牙的五家医院对连续性CAP患者进行了一项观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究。确定了患有CAP且PSI≤2的入院患者。入院医生完成了一份针对患者的调查问卷,以确定影响患者入院决策的临床因素。入院原因分为6类中的1类。我们还评估了入院原因是否与较差的临床结局[重症监护病房(ICU)入院、30天死亡率或再入院]相关。
共纳入155例住院患者。94例患者(60.6%)有两个或更多入院原因,包括临床检查结果异常(60%)、临床恶化迹象(43.2%)、合并症(28.4%)、社会心理因素(28.4%)、疑似甲型H1N1肺炎(20.6%)以及过去2周内近期去过急诊科(ED)(7.7%)。临床恶化迹象和临床检查结果异常与较差的临床结局相关(P<0.005)。
PSI≤2的低风险CAP患者因多种原因入院。临床检查结果异常和临床恶化迹象是与低风险CAP患者较差临床结局相关的两个特定入院原因。