Paris-Descartes University, Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Bone. 2013 Nov;57(1):232-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.07.040. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
The objective of this study was to consider whether trabecular bone score (TBS) improves on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurement alone for the prediction of incident fractures in postmenopausal women.
The OPUS study was conducted in ambulatory European women aged above 55years, recruited in 5 centers followed over 6years. For the assessment of the performance of TBS, baseline Hologic scans from 3 centers (Kiel, Paris and Sheffield) were available. Follow-up for incident fractures was available for 1007 women (mean age 65.9±6.9years). We compared the performance of TBS, aBMD, and their combination, by using net reclassification improvement (NRI, primary analysis) and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) c-statistical analysis with ORs and areas under the curves (AUCs) (secondary analyses).
82 (8.1%) subjects with incident clinical osteoporotic fractures, and 46 (4.6%) with incident radiographic vertebral fractures were recorded over 6years. Performance of TBS was significantly better than lumbar spine (LS) aBMD for the prediction of incident clinical osteoporotic fractures (NRI=16.3%, p=0.007). For radiographic vertebral fractures, TBS and LS aBMD had similar predictive power but the combination of TBS and LS aBMD increased the performance over LS aBMD alone (NRI=8.6%, p=0.046) but the prediction is similar to hip and femoral neck aBMD. In non osteoporotic women, TBS predicted incident fragility fractures similarly to LS aBMD.
This prospective study shows that in general population, TBS is a useful tool to improve the performance of lumbar spine aBMD for vertebral osteoporotic fractures.
本研究旨在探讨骨小梁评分(TBS)是否能提高骨密度(aBMD)对绝经后妇女骨折事件的预测作用。
OPUS 研究是在欧洲 55 岁以上的门诊女性中进行的,在 5 个中心招募,随访时间超过 6 年。为了评估 TBS 的性能,有 3 个中心(基尔、巴黎和谢菲尔德)的基线 Hologic 扫描结果可用。1007 名女性的骨折事件随访结果可用(平均年龄 65.9±6.9 岁)。我们使用净重新分类改善(NRI,主要分析)和接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)(次要分析)比较了 TBS、aBMD 及其组合的性能。
6 年内共记录了 82 例(8.1%)有临床骨质疏松性骨折事件的患者和 46 例(4.6%)有影像学椎体骨折事件的患者。TBS 对预测临床骨质疏松性骨折的性能明显优于腰椎 aBMD(NRI=16.3%,p=0.007)。对于影像学椎体骨折,TBS 和 LS aBMD 具有相似的预测能力,但 TBS 和 LS aBMD 的组合比 LS aBMD 单独使用能提高预测性能(NRI=8.6%,p=0.046),但预测效果与髋部和股骨颈 aBMD 相似。在非骨质疏松女性中,TBS 对脆性骨折的预测与 LS aBMD 相似。
这项前瞻性研究表明,在一般人群中,TBS 是提高腰椎 aBMD 对椎体骨质疏松性骨折预测性能的有用工具。