Suppr超能文献

评价一项基于计算机的教育干预措施,以改善模拟患者复苏期间的医疗团队合作和表现。

Evaluation of a computer-based educational intervention to improve medical teamwork and performance during simulated patient resuscitations.

机构信息

1Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI. 3Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 4Department of Management, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;41(11):2551-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829828f7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of a low-resource-demand, easily disseminated computer-based teamwork process training intervention on teamwork behaviors and patient care performance in code teams.

DESIGN

A randomized comparison trial of computer-based teamwork training versus placebo training was conducted from August 2010 through March 2011.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the simulation suite within the Kado Family Clinical Skills Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants (n = 231) were fourth-year medical students and first-, second-, and third-year emergency medicine residents at Wayne State University. Each participant was assigned to a team of four to six members (nteams = 45).

INTERVENTIONS

Teams were randomly assigned to receive either a 25-minute computer-based training module targeting appropriate resuscitation teamwork behaviors or a placebo training module.

MEASUREMENTS

Teamwork behaviors and patient care behaviors were video recorded during high-fidelity simulated patient resuscitations and coded by trained raters blinded to condition assignment and study hypotheses. Teamwork behavior items (e.g., "chest radiograph findings communicated to team" and "team member assists with intubation preparation") were standardized before combining to create overall teamwork scores. Similarly, patient care items ("chest radiograph correctly interpreted"; "time to start of compressions") were standardized before combining to create overall patient care scores. Subject matter expert reviews and pilot testing of scenario content, teamwork items, and patient care items provided evidence of content validity.

MAIN RESULTS

When controlling for team members' medically relevant experience, teams in the training condition demonstrated better teamwork (F [1, 42] = 4.81, p < 0.05; ηp = 10%) and patient care (F [1, 42] = 4.66, p < 0.05; ηp = 10%) than did teams in the placebo condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-based team training positively impacts teamwork and patient care during simulated patient resuscitations. This low-resource team training intervention may help to address the dissemination and sustainability issues associated with larger, more costly team training programs.

摘要

目的

确定一种资源需求低、易于传播的基于计算机的团队协作过程培训干预措施对编码团队的团队协作行为和患者护理绩效的影响。

设计

2010 年 8 月至 2011 年 3 月期间,进行了一项基于计算机的团队培训与安慰剂培训的随机比较试验。

地点

这项研究在韦恩州立大学医学院 Kado 家庭临床技能中心的模拟套房内进行。

参与者

参与者(n=231)为韦恩州立大学四年级医学生和一年级、二年级和三年级急诊住院医师。每位参与者都被分配到一个由四到六名成员组成的团队(nteams=45)。

干预措施

团队被随机分配接受 25 分钟的基于计算机的培训模块,以针对适当的复苏团队协作行为,或接受安慰剂培训模块。

测量

在高保真模拟患者复苏期间,通过训练有素的评估人员对团队协作行为和患者护理行为进行视频记录,并对条件分配和研究假设进行盲评。在组合创建整体团队协作分数之前,对团队协作行为项目(例如,“胸部 X 光片结果传达给团队”和“团队成员协助插管准备”)进行标准化。类似地,在组合创建整体患者护理分数之前,对患者护理项目(“正确解读胸部 X 光片”;“开始按压的时间”)进行标准化。主题专家对情景内容、团队协作项目和患者护理项目的审查和试点测试提供了内容有效性的证据。

主要结果

当控制团队成员与医学相关的经验时,培训条件下的团队表现出更好的团队协作(F[1,42]=4.81,p<0.05;ηp=10%)和患者护理(F[1,42]=4.66,p<0.05;ηp=10%)比安慰剂条件下的团队。

结论

基于计算机的团队培训对模拟患者复苏期间的团队协作和患者护理产生积极影响。这种低资源团队培训干预措施可能有助于解决与更大、更昂贵的团队培训计划相关的传播和可持续性问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验