Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3500 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands,
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Mar;59(3):554-63. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2820-9. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with potentially serious infections, including tuberculosis (TB) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of extensive TB screening and HBV screening prior to initiating TNF-α inhibitors in CD.
We constructed two Markov models: (1) comparing tuberculin skin test (TST) combined with chest X-ray (conventional TB screening) versus TST and chest X-ray followed by the interferon-gamma release assay (extensive TB screening) in diagnosing TB; and (2) HBV screening versus no HBV screening. Our base-case included an adult CD patient starting with infliximab treatment. Input parameters were extracted from the literature. Direct medical costs were assessed and discounted following a third-party payer perspective. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity and Monte Carlo analyses were performed over wide ranges of probability and cost estimates.
At base-case, the ICERs of extensive screening and HBV screening were €64,340 and €75,760 respectively to gain one quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses concluded that extensive TB screening was a cost-effective strategy if the latent TB prevalence is more than 12 % or if the false positivity rate of TST is more than 20 %. HBV screening became cost-effective if HBV reactivation or HBV-related mortality is higher than 37 and 62 %, respectively.
Extensive TB screening and HBV screening are not cost-effective compared with conventional TB screening and no HBV screening, respectively. However, when targeted at high-risk patient groups, these screening strategies are likely to become cost-effective.
在克罗恩病(CD)患者中使用肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂与潜在的严重感染有关,包括结核病(TB)和乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)。我们评估了在开始 TNF-α抑制剂治疗之前对 CD 患者进行广泛 TB 筛查和 HBV 筛查的成本效益。
我们构建了两个 Markov 模型:(1)比较结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)联合胸部 X 光(常规 TB 筛查)与 TST 和胸部 X 光后干扰素-γ释放试验(广泛 TB 筛查)在诊断 TB 中的作用;(2)HBV 筛查与不进行 HBV 筛查。我们的基础病例包括开始使用英夫利昔单抗治疗的成年 CD 患者。输入参数从文献中提取。按照第三方支付者的观点评估了直接医疗成本并进行了贴现。主要结果是增量成本效益比(ICER)。在广泛的概率和成本估计范围内进行了敏感性和蒙特卡罗分析。
在基础病例中,广泛筛查和 HBV 筛查的 ICER 分别为 64340 欧元和 75760 欧元,以获得一个质量调整生命年。敏感性分析得出结论,如果潜伏性 TB 患病率超过 12%,或者 TST 的假阳性率超过 20%,则广泛 TB 筛查是一种具有成本效益的策略。如果 HBV 再激活或 HBV 相关死亡率分别高于 37%和 62%,则 HBV 筛查具有成本效益。
与常规 TB 筛查和不进行 HBV 筛查相比,广泛 TB 筛查和 HBV 筛查均不具有成本效益。然而,当针对高风险患者群体时,这些筛查策略可能具有成本效益。