Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物转换为口服美沙酮后 QTc 间期的变化。

Changes of QTc interval after opioid switching to oral methadone.

机构信息

Cancer Pain and Palliative Care Unit, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo 312, 90146, Palermo, Italy,

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3421-4. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1928-y. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

Abstract

A consecutive sample of patients who were switched from strong opioids to methadone in a period of 1 year was surveyed. QTc was assessed before switching (T0) and after achieving adequate analgesia and an acceptable level of adverse effects (Ts). Twenty-eight of 33 patients were switched to methadone successfully. The mean initial methadone doses at T0 were 67.1 mg/day (SD ±80.2, range 12-390). The mean QTc interval at T0 was 400 ms (SD ±30, range 330-450). The mean QTc interval at Ts (median 5 days) was 430 ms (SD ±26, range 390-500). The difference (7.7 %) was significant (p < 0.0005). Only two patients had a QTc of 500 ms. No serious arrhythmia was observed. At the linear regression analysis, there was no significant association between mean opioid doses expressed as oral morphine equivalents and QTc at T0 (p = 0.428), nor between mean methadone doses and QTc at Ts (p = 0.315). No age differences were found with previous opioid doses (p = 0.917), methadone doses (p = 0.613), QTc at T0 (p = 0.173), QTc at Ts (p = 0.297), and final opioid-methadone conversion ratio (p = 0.064). While methadone used for opioids switching seems to be an optimal choice to improve the opioid response in patients poorly responsive to the previous opioid, the possible QTc prolongation should be of concern despite not producing clinical consequences in this group of patients. A larger number of patients should be assessed to quantify the risk of serious arrhythmia.

摘要

在 1 年的时间内,对从强阿片类药物转换为美沙酮的连续患者样本进行了调查。在转换前(T0)和达到足够的镇痛效果和可接受的不良反应水平(Ts)后评估了 QTc。33 例患者中有 28 例成功转换为美沙酮。T0 时的平均初始美沙酮剂量为 67.1mg/天(SD±80.2,范围 12-390)。T0 时的平均 QTc 间隔为 400ms(SD±30,范围 330-450)。Ts(中位数为 5 天)时的平均 QTc 间隔为 430ms(SD±26,范围 390-500)。差异(7.7%)有统计学意义(p<0.0005)。只有 2 例患者的 QTc 为 500ms。未观察到严重心律失常。在线性回归分析中,T0 时平均阿片类药物剂量表示为口服吗啡等效物与 QTc 之间无显著相关性(p=0.428),Ts 时平均美沙酮剂量与 QTc 之间也无显著相关性(p=0.315)。与之前的阿片类药物剂量(p=0.917)、美沙酮剂量(p=0.613)、T0 时的 QTc(p=0.173)、Ts 时的 QTc(p=0.297)和最终阿片类药物-美沙酮转换比(p=0.064)均无年龄差异。虽然美沙酮用于转换阿片类药物似乎是改善对先前阿片类药物反应不佳的患者的阿片类药物反应的最佳选择,但尽管在这组患者中没有产生临床后果,但可能的 QTc 延长仍应引起关注。应该评估更多的患者来量化严重心律失常的风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验