Van der Heide Loek A, van Ninhuijs Bob, Bergsma Arjen, Gelderblom Gert Jan, van der Pijl Dick J, de Witte Luc P
Research Centre for Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Department of Electrical Engineering, Electromechanics and Power Electronics Group, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014 Aug;38(4):287-302. doi: 10.1177/0309364613498538. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
Assistive devices that augment arm function were already introduced during the polio era. Devices are still being developed, but a review has not been performed thus far.
To create an overview and categorize assistive devices facilitating arm function in activities of daily living for people with decreased arm function.
Literature review.
A systematic review in three scientific literature databases. Conference proceedings, assistive technology databases, and references were searched and experts consulted. This resulted in a database of dynamic arm supports. Product information was added, and the devices were categorized.
A total of 104 dynamic arm supports were found. These could be categorized as nonactuated devices (N = 39), passively actuated devices (N = 24), actively actuated devices (N = 34), or devices using the functional electrical stimulation principle (N = 7). Functionality analysis resulted in second-level categorization: tremor suppression, facilitation of anti-gravity movement, and assistance of specific joint motion.
All devices could be ordered in a categorization of low complexity. Many have been developed; most have disappeared and have been succeeded by similar devices. Limitations of the devices found mainly concern interfacing and the range of motion facilitated. Future devices could make use of whatever residual strength is available in the users' arm for control.
The provided overview of devices in this article and the classification developed is relevant for practitioners seeking assistive solutions for their clients as it makes the range of developed solutions both accessible and comprehensible.
在小儿麻痹症流行时期就已引入增强手臂功能的辅助装置。目前仍在研发此类装置,但迄今为止尚未进行过综述。
对有助于手臂功能减退者在日常生活活动中使用手臂的辅助装置进行概述和分类。
文献综述。
在三个科学文献数据库中进行系统综述。检索会议论文集、辅助技术数据库及参考文献,并咨询专家。由此建立了一个动态手臂支撑装置数据库。添加了产品信息,并对这些装置进行了分类。
共找到104种动态手臂支撑装置。这些装置可分为非驱动装置(N = 39)、被动驱动装置(N = 24)、主动驱动装置(N = 34)或使用功能性电刺激原理的装置(N = 7)。功能分析得出二级分类:震颤抑制、促进抗重力运动以及辅助特定关节运动。
所有装置都可按低复杂度分类排序。已研发出许多装置;大多数已消失,被类似装置所取代。所发现装置的局限性主要涉及接口和所促进的运动范围。未来的装置可以利用用户手臂中可用的任何残余力量进行控制。
本文提供的装置概述及所制定的分类对为其客户寻求辅助解决方案的从业者具有参考价值,因为它使已开发的解决方案范围既易于获取又易于理解。