Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 7;8(8):e68338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068338. eCollection 2013.
Global climate change is known to result in the emergence or re-emergence of some infectious diseases. Reliable methods to identify the infectious diseases of humans and animals and that are most likely to be influenced by climate are therefore required. Since different priorities will affect the decision to address a particular pathogen threat, decision makers need a standardised method of prioritisation. Ranking methods and Multi-Criteria Decision approaches provide such a standardised method and were employed here to design two different pathogen prioritisation tools. The opinion of 64 experts was elicited to assess the importance of 40 criteria that could be used to prioritise emerging infectious diseases of humans and animals in Canada. A weight was calculated for each criterion according to the expert opinion. Attributes were defined for each criterion as a transparent and repeatable method of measurement. Two different Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis tools were tested, both of which used an additive aggregation approach. These were an Excel spreadsheet tool and a tool developed in software 'M-MACBETH'. The tools were trialed on nine 'test' pathogens. Two different methods of criteria weighting were compared, one using fixed weighting values, the other using probability distributions to account for uncertainty and variation in expert opinion. The ranking of the nine pathogens varied according to the weighting method that was used. In both tools, using both weighting methods, the diseases that tended to rank the highest were West Nile virus, Giardiasis and Chagas, while Coccidioidomycosis tended to rank the lowest. Both tools are a simple and user friendly approach to prioritising pathogens according to climate change by including explicit scoring of 40 criteria and incorporating weighting methods based on expert opinion. They provide a dynamic interactive method that can help to identify pathogens for which a full risk assessment should be pursued.
全球气候变化会导致一些传染病的出现或再现。因此,我们需要可靠的方法来识别最有可能受到气候变化影响的人类和动物传染病。由于不同的优先级会影响应对特定病原体威胁的决策,决策者需要一种标准化的优先级排序方法。排名方法和多标准决策方法提供了这样一种标准化方法,本文采用这些方法设计了两种不同的病原体优先级排序工具。为了评估加拿大人类和动物新发传染病的 40 个潜在指标的重要性,我们向 64 位专家征求了意见。根据专家意见,为每个标准计算了权重。为每个标准定义了属性,作为一种透明和可重复的测量方法。我们测试了两种不同的多标准决策分析工具,都使用了加法聚合方法。一种是 Excel 电子表格工具,另一种是在软件“M-MACBETH”中开发的工具。这两种工具都在 9 种“测试”病原体上进行了测试。比较了两种不同的标准权重方法,一种使用固定权重值,另一种使用概率分布来考虑专家意见的不确定性和变化。使用不同的权重方法,这 9 种病原体的排名会有所不同。在这两种工具中,使用这两种权重方法,排名较高的疾病通常是西尼罗河病毒、贾第虫病和恰加斯病,而球孢子菌病的排名往往较低。这两种工具都是根据气候变化对病原体进行优先级排序的简单易用的方法,包括对 40 个标准进行明确评分,并结合基于专家意见的权重方法。它们提供了一种动态交互的方法,可以帮助确定需要进行全面风险评估的病原体。