Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 8;8(8):e69924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069924. eCollection 2013.
We demonstrate quantitatively that, as predicted by evolutionary theory, sequences of homologous proteins from different species converge as we go further and further back in time. The converse, a non-evolutionary model can be expressed as probabilities, and the test works for chloroplast, nuclear and mitochondrial sequences, as well as for sequences that diverged at different time depths. Even on our conservative test, the probability that chance could produce the observed levels of ancestral convergence for just one of the eight datasets of 51 proteins is ≈1×10⁻¹⁹ and combined over 8 datasets is ≈1×10⁻¹³². By comparison, there are about 10⁸⁰ protons in the universe, hence the probability that the sequences could have been produced by a process involving unrelated ancestral sequences is about 10⁵⁰ lower than picking, among all protons, the same proton at random twice in a row. A non-evolutionary control model shows no convergence, and only a small number of parameters are required to account for the observations. It is time that that researchers insisted that doubters put up testable alternatives to evolution.
我们定量地证明了,正如进化理论所预测的那样,随着时间的推移,来自不同物种的同源蛋白质序列会不断趋同。相反,一个非进化模型可以用概率来表示,而且这个检验适用于叶绿体、核和线粒体序列,以及在不同时间深度上分化的序列。即使在我们保守的检验中,仅仅一个由 51 种蛋白质组成的数据集的祖先趋同程度,其机会产生的概率约为 1×10⁻¹⁹,而在 8 个数据集上的综合概率约为 1×10⁻¹³²。相比之下,宇宙中大约有 10⁸⁰ 个质子,因此,这些序列是由一个涉及不相关的祖先序列的过程产生的概率,大约比在所有质子中连续两次随机选择相同质子的概率低 10⁵⁰ 倍。一个非进化控制模型显示没有趋同,并且只需要少量的参数来解释观察结果。现在是时候让研究人员要求怀疑论者提出可检验的进化替代方案了。