Suppr超能文献

儿童不明原因猝死。尸检报告质量审核。

Sudden unexplained death in childhood. An audit of the quality of autopsy reporting.

作者信息

Treacy A, Cryan J, McGarvey C, Devaney D, Matthews T G

机构信息

Department of Histopathology, Children's University Hospital, Temple St, Dublin 1.

出版信息

Ir Med J. 2013 Mar;106(3):70-2.

Abstract

Cases of sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC) in Ireland in children aged > 1 year and < 5 years were examined in order to assess the quality of autopsy reporting. All SUDC cases are notified to and documented by the National Sudden Infant Death Register (NSIDR) in Ireland along with all cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) referring to sudden infant deaths less than one year of age. The database of the NSIDR in Ireland was interrogated and cases of SIDS and SUDC were compared over a fifteen-year period (1995-2009). SIDS cases whose autopsies were conducted in the same hospital in the same year as the index SUDC case were used for comparison. The autopsy report for each case was examined and modified Rushton (MR) score(s1) calculated. MR scores were compared along with the number of paediatric pathology prosectors and the year of autopsy examination between the two groups. 45 cases were registered as SUDC (age 52 - 152 weeks) between 1995-2009. Autopsy reports were available for 43/45 (95%) of these. 43 SIDS cases from the same year and site of autopsy were used for comparison. Overall MR scores were higher in the SIDS cases, with 29/43 (67%) cases obtaining the minimum arbitrary score (MAS) of > 300 compared to 25/43 (58%) of SUDC cases. Paediatric pathologists in specialist centres carried out similar numbers of SIDS autopsies and SUDC autopsies (46% SIDS, 44% SUDC). Autopsies carried out by paediatric pathologists in specialist centres met the MAS in 19/21 (90%) SIDS cases and 18/19 (95%) SUDC cases. Based on our findings we recommend referral of all SUDC cases to specialist centres for optimal autopsy examination and investigation, and that cases of sudden unexpected death in children over 1 year of age are investigated according to the same guidelines as are used for unexpected death under one year of age.

摘要

对爱尔兰1岁以上至5岁儿童的不明原因儿童猝死(SUDC)病例进行了检查,以评估尸检报告的质量。爱尔兰的所有SUDC病例以及所有婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS,指1岁以下婴儿猝死)病例都由国家婴儿猝死登记处(NSIDR)进行通报和记录。对爱尔兰NSIDR的数据库进行了查询,并在15年期间(1995 - 2009年)对SIDS和SUDC病例进行了比较。将与索引SUDC病例在同一年于同一医院进行尸检的SIDS病例用于比较。检查了每个病例的尸检报告并计算了改良的拉什顿(MR)评分(s1)。比较了两组之间的MR评分、儿科病理检查人员数量以及尸检年份。1995年至2009年期间登记了45例SUDC(年龄52 - 152周)。其中43/45(95%)有尸检报告。使用了同年且在同一尸检地点的43例SIDS病例进行比较。SIDS病例的总体MR评分更高,43例中有29例(67%)获得了大于300的最低任意评分(MAS),而SUDC病例为25/43(58%)。专科中心的儿科病理学家进行的SIDS尸检和SUDC尸检数量相似(SIDS占46%,SUDC占44%)。专科中心的儿科病理学家进行的尸检在19/21(90%)的SIDS病例和18/19(95%)的SUDC病例中达到了MAS。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议将所有SUDC病例转诊至专科中心进行最佳的尸检检查和调查,并且1岁以上儿童的意外猝死病例应按照与1岁以下意外死亡相同的指南进行调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验