Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias of Genetic Origin and Laboratory of Cardiovascular Genetics IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy.
Department of Clinical Genetics Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield United Kingdom.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e029100. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029100. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Background Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is the leading cause of death up to age 1. Sudden unexplained death in childhood (SUDC) is similar but affects mostly toddlers aged 1 to 4. SUDC is rarer than SIDS, and although cardiogenetic testing (molecular autopsy) identifies an underlying cause in a fraction of SIDS, less is known about SUDC. Methods and Results Seventy-seven SIDS and 16 SUDC cases underwent molecular autopsy with 25 definitive-evidence arrhythmia-associated genes. In 18 cases, another 76 genes with varying degrees of evidence were analyzed. Parents were offered cascade screening. Double-blind review of clinical-genetic data established genotype-phenotype correlations. The yield of likely pathogenic variants in the 25 genes was higher in SUDC than in SIDS (18.8% [3/16] versus 2.6% [2/77], respectively; =0.03), whereas novel/ultra-rare variants of uncertain significance were comparably represented. Rare variants of uncertain significance and likely benign variants were found only in SIDS. In cases with expanded analyses, likely pathogenic/likely benign variants stemmed only from definitive-evidence genes, whereas all other genes contributed only variants of uncertain significance. Among 24 parents screened, variant status and phenotype largely agreed, and 3 cases positively correlated for cardiac channelopathies. Genotype-phenotype correlations significantly aided variant adjudication. Conclusions Genetic yield is higher in SUDC than in SIDS although, in both, it is contributed only by definitive-evidence genes. SIDS/SUDC cascade family screening facilitates establishment or dismissal of a diagnosis through definitive variant adjudication indicating that anonymity is no longer justifiable. Channelopathies may underlie a relevant fraction of SUDC. Binary classifications of genetic causality (pathogenic versus benign) could not always be adequate.
背景 婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)是 1 岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。儿童突发性不明原因死亡(SUDC)与之相似,但主要影响 1 至 4 岁的幼儿。SUDC 比 SIDS 罕见,尽管心脏基因检测(分子尸检)可以确定 SIDS 病例中的一部分潜在病因,但对 SUDC 的了解较少。 方法和结果 77 例 SIDS 和 16 例 SUDC 病例接受了分子尸检,其中包括 25 个明确证据与心律失常相关的基因。在另外 18 例病例中,还分析了另外 76 个具有不同程度证据的基因。向父母提供了级联筛查。对临床遗传数据的双盲审查建立了基因型-表型相关性。在这 25 个基因中,SUDC 中可能致病变异的检出率高于 SIDS(18.8%[3/16]与 2.6%[2/77],=0.03),而新颖/超罕见的意义不确定的变异则具有可比性。只有 SIDS 中发现了罕见的意义不确定的变异和可能良性的变异。在进行了扩展分析的病例中,可能致病/可能良性的变异仅源自明确证据的基因,而所有其他基因仅贡献意义不确定的变异。在 24 名接受筛查的父母中,变异状态和表型基本一致,有 3 例心脏通道病呈正相关。基因型-表型相关性极大地有助于变异的判断。 结论 尽管 SIDS 和 SUDC 的遗传检出率都仅由明确证据的基因贡献,但 SUDC 中的遗传检出率高于 SIDS。SIDS/SUDC 级联家族筛查通过明确的变异判断促进了诊断的建立或排除,这表明匿名不再是合理的。通道病可能是 SUDC 的一个相关因素。遗传因果关系的二分法(致病性与良性)可能并不总是足够的。