Suppr超能文献

饲养条件对零售生禽肉微生物质量的影响。

Impact of rearing conditions on the microbiological quality of raw retail poultry meat.

机构信息

Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Univ. of Tennessee 2605 River Dr. Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.

出版信息

J Food Sci. 2013 Aug;78(8):M1232-5. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12212.

Abstract

There is a gap in knowledge of microbiological quality in raw chicken products produced by nonconventional methods and no studies have reported the microbiological quality of turkeys produced under different rearing environments. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the microbiological quality of conventionally and organically reared whole chicken and turkey carcasses purchased from 3 retail outlets in Knoxville, Tenn., U.S.A. A total of 100 raw broiler chickens organically (n = 50) and 50 raw turkey carcasses consisting of 3 brands reared either conventionally (n = 25) or organically (n = 25) were evaluated. The FDA BAM protocol for rinsing poultry carcasses was used to enumerate of aerobic bacteria, Campylobacter, and Staphylococcus spp., and for qualitative analysis of Salmonella. Organic chickens from one brand had the highest average counts of aerobic bacteria, Staphylococcus spp. and Campylobacter (4.8, 4.8, and 4.7 Log10 CFU/mL rinsate, respectively) while the other organic brand had the lowest average counts (3.4, 3.3, and 3.1, respectively) of all 4 brands evaluated. The organic turkeys had the highest average counts of these same bacteria (4, 3.9, and 3.8, respectively) compared to the 2 brands of conventional turkeys evaluated. Salmonella (5% prevalence) was isolated only from organic chickens and turkeys. From these data, it appears that the microbiological quality of the raw product was not dependent on rearing conditions and, thus, it cannot be assumed that organic raw poultry is safer than conventionally raised poultry in terms of microbiological quality.

摘要

目前对于非常规方法生产的生鸡肉产品的微生物质量知之甚少,而且没有研究报告过在不同饲养环境下生产的火鸡的微生物质量。因此,本研究旨在比较从美国田纳西州诺克斯维尔的 3 家零售店购买的常规饲养和有机饲养的整鸡和火鸡胴体的微生物质量。共评估了 100 只有机饲养的肉鸡(n = 50)和 50 只火鸡胴体(由 3 个品牌组成,分别为常规饲养(n = 25)或有机饲养(n = 25))。使用 FDA BAM 方案对禽肉胴体进行冲洗,以对需氧菌、弯曲杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌进行计数,并对沙门氏菌进行定性分析。一个品牌的有机鸡具有最高的需氧菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和弯曲杆菌的平均计数(冲洗液中分别为 4.8、4.8 和 4.7 Log10 CFU/mL),而另一个有机品牌的平均计数(分别为 3.4、3.3 和 3.1)是所有 4 个品牌中最低的。与评估的 2 个常规火鸡品牌相比,有机火鸡具有这些相同细菌的最高平均计数(分别为 4、3.9 和 3.8)。仅从有机鸡和火鸡中分离出了沙门氏菌(5%的流行率)。根据这些数据,似乎生鸡肉产品的微生物质量与饲养条件无关,因此,不能假设有机生禽肉在微生物质量方面比常规饲养的禽肉更安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验