National Acoustic Laboratories and the Hearing CRC , Sydney, New South Wales , Australia.
Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):795-800. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.817688. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
To introduce and verify an algorithm designed to administer adaptive speech-in- noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
Speech-in-noise performances were measured using BKB sentences presented in diffuse babble-noise, using morphemic scoring. Target of the algorithm was a test-retest standard deviation of 1.13 dB within the presentation of 32 sentences. Normal-hearing participants completed repeated measures using manual administration targeting 50% correct, and the automated procedure targeting 25%, 50%, and 75% correct. Aided hearing-impaired participants completed testing with the automated procedure targeting 25%, 50%, and 75% correct, repeating measurements at the 50% point three times.
Twelve normal-hearing and 63 hearing-impaired people who had English as first language.
Relative to the manual procedure, the algorithm produced the same speech reception threshold in noise (p = 0.96) and lower test-retest reliability on normal-hearing listeners. Both groups obtained significantly different results at the three target points (p < 0.04) with observed reliability close to expected. Target accuracy was not reached within 32 sentences for 18% of measurements on hearing-impaired participants.
The reliability of the algorithm was verified. A second test is recommended if the target variability is not reached during the first measurement.
介绍并验证一种算法,旨在在可选择的心理测量函数点上以指定的可靠性进行自适应语音噪声测试。
使用在弥散噪声中的 BKB 句子进行语音噪声性能测量,使用词素评分。算法的目标是在呈现 32 个句子时测试-重测标准偏差为 1.13dB。正常听力参与者使用手动管理完成重复测量,目标是 50%正确,自动程序目标是 25%、50%和 75%正确。使用自动程序针对 25%、50%和 75%正确的目标,重复测量 50%点三次,为有辅助听力障碍的参与者进行测试。
12 名正常听力和 63 名听力障碍者,他们的母语是英语。
与手动程序相比,该算法在噪声中的语音接收阈值相同(p=0.96),在正常听力者中的测试-重测可靠性较低。两组在三个目标点都获得了显著不同的结果(p<0.04),观察到的可靠性接近预期。在听力障碍参与者的 18%测量中,有 18%的测量未达到目标变异性,无法在 32 个句子内完成。
验证了算法的可靠性。如果第一次测量未达到目标变异性,则建议进行第二次测试。