McMahon Catherine M, Boisvert Isabelle, de Lissa Peter, Granger Louise, Ibrahim Ronny, Lo Chi Yhun, Miles Kelly, Graham Petra L
Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia; The HEARing CRC, Melbourne, VICAustralia.
The HEARing CRC, Melbourne, VICAustralia; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSWAustralia.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 24;7:745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745. eCollection 2016.
Listening to degraded speech can be challenging and requires a continuous investment of cognitive resources, which is more challenging for those with hearing loss. However, while alpha power (8-12 Hz) and pupil dilation have been suggested as objective correlates of listening effort, it is not clear whether they assess the same cognitive processes involved, or other sensory and/or neurophysiological mechanisms that are associated with the task. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare alpha power and pupil dilation during a sentence recognition task in 15 randomized levels of noise (-7 to +7 dB SNR) using highly intelligible (16 channel vocoded) and moderately intelligible (6 channel vocoded) speech. Twenty young normal-hearing adults participated in the study, however, due to extraneous noise, data from only 16 (10 females, 6 males; aged 19-28 years) was used in the Electroencephalography (EEG) analysis and 10 in the pupil analysis. Behavioral testing of perceived effort and speech performance was assessed at 3 fixed SNRs per participant and was comparable to sentence recognition performance assessed in the physiological test session for both 16- and 6-channel vocoded sentences. Results showed a significant interaction between channel vocoding for both the alpha power and the pupil size changes. While both measures significantly decreased with more positive SNRs for the 16-channel vocoding, this was not observed with the 6-channel vocoding. The results of this study suggest that these measures may encode different processes involved in speech perception, which show similar trends for highly intelligible speech, but diverge for more spectrally degraded speech. The results to date suggest that these objective correlates of listening effort, and the cognitive processes involved in listening effort, are not yet sufficiently well understood to be used within a clinical setting.
听受损语音具有挑战性,需要持续投入认知资源,这对听力损失者来说更具挑战性。然而,虽然阿尔法波功率(8 - 12赫兹)和瞳孔扩张被认为是听力努力的客观相关指标,但尚不清楚它们评估的是否是相同的认知过程,还是与该任务相关的其他感觉和/或神经生理机制。因此,本研究的目的是比较在15个随机噪声水平(-7至+7分贝信噪比)下,使用高清晰度(16通道声码)和中等清晰度(6通道声码)语音进行句子识别任务时的阿尔法波功率和瞳孔扩张情况。20名听力正常的年轻成年人参与了该研究,然而,由于外部噪声,脑电图(EEG)分析仅使用了16人的数据(10名女性,6名男性;年龄19 - 28岁),瞳孔分析使用了10人的数据。对每个参与者在3个固定信噪比下进行了感知努力和语音表现的行为测试,其与在生理测试环节中对16通道和6通道声码句子评估的句子识别表现相当。结果显示,对于阿尔法波功率和瞳孔大小变化,通道声码之间存在显著交互作用。虽然对于16通道声码,随着信噪比升高,这两种测量指标均显著下降,但6通道声码未观察到这种情况。本研究结果表明,这些测量指标可能编码了语音感知中涉及的不同过程,对于高清晰度语音显示出相似趋势,但对于频谱退化更严重的语音则有所不同。迄今为止的结果表明,这些听力努力的客观相关指标以及听力努力中涉及的认知过程,尚未被充分理解到可在临床环境中使用的程度。