• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高冲击波率下利用声空泡去除来增强 SWL 疗效:一项体外研究。

Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.

机构信息

1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):90-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0313. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0313
PMID:23957846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3880900/
Abstract

Rate-dependent efficacy has been extensively documented in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) stone comminution, with shock waves (SWs) delivered at a low rate producing more efficient fragmentation in comparison to those delivered at high rates. Cavitation is postulated to be the primary source underlying this rate phenomenon. Residual bubble nuclei that persist along the axis of SW propagation can drastically attenuate the waveform's negative phase, decreasing the energy which is ultimately delivered to the stone and compromising comminution. The effect is more pronounced at high rates, as residual nuclei have less time to passively dissolve between successive shocks. In this study, we investigate a means of actively removing such nuclei from the field using a low-amplitude acoustic pulse designed to stimulate their aggregation and subsequent coalescence. To test the efficacy of this bubble removal scheme, model kidney stones were treated in vitro using a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. SWL was applied at rates of 120, 60, or 30 SW/min with or without the incorporation of bubble removal pulses. Optical images displaying the extent of cavitation in the vicinity of the stone were also collected for each treatment. Results show that bubble removal pulses drastically enhance the efficacy of stone comminution at the higher rates tested (120 and 60 SW/min), while optical images show a corresponding reduction in bubble excitation along the SW axis when bubble removal pulses are incorporated. At the lower rate of 30 SW/min, no difference in stone comminution or bubble excitation was detected with the addition of bubble removal pulses, suggesting that remnant nuclei had sufficient time for more complete dissolution. These results corroborate previous work regarding the role of cavitation in rate-dependent SWL efficacy, and suggest that the effect can be mitigated via appropriate control of the cavitation environment surrounding the stone.

摘要

在体外使用研究型液电碎石机对模型肾结石进行了处理。以 120、60 或 30 SW/min 的速率施加 SWL,或在施加 SWL 的同时施加气泡去除脉冲。还收集了显示结石附近空化程度的光学图像。结果表明,气泡去除脉冲在较高的测试速率(120 和 60 SW/min)下极大地提高了结石粉碎的效果,而光学图像显示,当加入气泡去除脉冲时,SW 轴上的气泡激发相应减少。在较低的速率 30 SW/min 下,加入气泡去除脉冲对结石粉碎或气泡激发没有差异,这表明残余核有足够的时间进行更完全的溶解。这些结果与关于空化在 SWL 功效的速率依赖性中的作用的先前工作一致,并表明可以通过适当控制结石周围的空化环境来减轻这种影响。

相似文献

1
Acoustic bubble removal to enhance SWL efficacy at high shock rate: an in vitro study.高冲击波率下利用声空泡去除来增强 SWL 疗效:一项体外研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Jan;28(1):90-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0313. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
2
Enhanced High-Rate Shockwave Lithotripsy Stone Comminution in an In Vivo Porcine Model Using Acoustic Bubble Coalescence.在体内猪模型中使用声泡聚结增强高速冲击波碎石术的结石粉碎效果。
J Endourol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1321-1325. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0407.
3
Controlled cavitation to augment SWL stone comminution: mechanistic insights in vitro.控制空化增强 SWL 碎石:体外的机制见解。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Feb;60(2):301-9. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2566.
4
Removal of residual cavitation nuclei to enhance histotripsy erosion of model urinary stones.去除残余空化核以增强组织超声破碎对模型尿路结石的侵蚀作用。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2015 May;62(5):896-904. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.7001.
5
Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.为何结石在低冲击波频率下比高频率下更易破碎:使用研究型液电碎石机的体外研究
J Endourol. 2006 Aug;20(8):537-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.537.
6
Suppressing bubble shielding effect in shock wave lithotripsy by low intensity pulsed ultrasound.低强度脉冲超声抑制冲击波碎石术中的气泡屏蔽效应。
Ultrasonics. 2015 Jan;55:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
7
Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.增强型冲击波碎石术结合主动空化抑制技术。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3275. doi: 10.1121/1.5131649.
8
The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.治疗策略对冲击波碎石术中结石粉碎效率的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Jul;172(1):349-54. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132356.97888.8b.
9
Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.对结石表面因体外冲击波碎石术产生的空化效应而发出的声发射进行定量测量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):1929-32. doi: 10.1121/1.2177589.
10
The role of energy density and acoustic cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.能量密度和声空化在冲击波碎石术中的作用。
Ultrasonics. 2010 Feb;50(2):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Low intermediate or high: A systematic review and meta-analysis.哪种频率更适合小儿冲击波碎石术?低、中还是高频率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 15;10:1063159. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1063159. eCollection 2023.
2
Experimental Observation of Isolative Efficacy of a Solid Coupling Medium in Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy-Implications to Nosocomial Infection Prevention.体外冲击波碎石术中固体耦合介质隔离效果的实验观察——对医院感染预防的启示
Pathogens. 2022 Sep 27;11(10):1103. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11101103.
3
A clinical observational study of effectiveness of a solid coupling medium in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术中固体耦合介质有效性的临床观察研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Apr 12;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01001-y.
4
Newly designed solid coupling medium for reducing trapped air pockets during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy_ a phantom study.新型固体耦合介质在体外冲击波碎石术中减少气穴现象的实验研究。
BMC Urol. 2021 May 14;21(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00847-y.
5
Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Intermediate or low: a prospective randomized study.对于小儿冲击波碎石术,哪种频率更好?中能还是低能:一项前瞻性随机研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3963-3969. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03696-4. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
6
Summary of "Biomedical Acoustics and Physical Acoustics: Shock Waves and Ultrasound for Calculus Fragmentation".《生物医学声学与物理声学:用于结石破碎的冲击波与超声》总结
Proc Meet Acoust. 2018 Nov 5;35(1). doi: 10.1121/2.0000948.
7
Enhanced shockwave lithotripsy with active cavitation mitigation.增强型冲击波碎石术结合主动空化抑制技术。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3275. doi: 10.1121/1.5131649.
8
Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.激光碎石术引起的尿路加热模拟。
J Endourol. 2019 Feb;33(2):113-119. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0485. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
Some Work on the Diagnosis and Management of Kidney Stones with Ultrasound.超声在肾结石诊断与治疗方面的一些研究
Acoust Today. 2017 Winter;13(4):52-59.
10
Acoustic Methods for Increasing the Cavitation Initiation Pressure Threshold.提高空化起始压力阈值的声学方法。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Nov;65(11):2012-2019. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2867793. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术中的湍流水耦合。
Phys Med Biol. 2013 Feb 7;58(3):735-48. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/735. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
2
Bubble proliferation in the cavitation field of a shock wave lithotripter.冲击波碎石术中空化场中的气泡增殖。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug;130(2):EL87-93. doi: 10.1121/1.3609920.
3
A composite kidney stone phantom with mechanical properties controllable over the range of human kidney stones.具有可在人肾结石范围内控制的机械性能的复合肾结石模型。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2010 Jan;3(1):130-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
4
Cavitation selectively reduces the negative-pressure phase of lithotripter shock pulses.空化作用选择性地降低了碎石机冲击脉冲的负压阶段。
Acoust Res Lett Online. 2005 Nov 3;6(4):280-286. doi: 10.1121/1.2127115.
5
Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors.放电频率对冲击波碎石机性能的影响。
BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1681-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07896.x. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
6
The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis.冲击波频率对冲击波碎石术治疗效果的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):194-7; discussion 197. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.173. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
7
Impact of shockwave coupling on efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.冲击波耦合对体外冲击波碎石术疗效的影响
J Endourol. 2007 Feb;21(2):137-40. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0179.
8
Improvement of stone comminution by slow delivery rate of shock waves in extracorporeal lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术中通过缓慢释放冲击波来改善结石粉碎效果。
Int J Urol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1461-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01609.x.
9
Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter.为何结石在低冲击波频率下比高频率下更易破碎:使用研究型液电碎石机的体外研究
J Endourol. 2006 Aug;20(8):537-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.537.
10
Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?治疗速度较慢会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立肾或输尿管结石的疗效吗?
J Urol. 2006 Apr;175(4):1370-3; discussion 1373-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00683-X.