Oncel Guray, Oncel Dilek
Sifa University, Izmir, Turkey.
Heart Surg Forum. 2013 Aug 1;16(4):E198-204. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20121132.
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a specific indicator of and an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis; however, calcium scoring may miss noncalcified plaques, which may have clinical importance. The aim of this study was both to identify the presence and extent of coronary plaques during computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with a zero CAC score and to evaluate the effect of risk factors and symptom status on the presence of noncalcified plaques.
In this retrospective study, we analyzed the cases of 842 consecutive patients between October 2006 and November 2011. Of these patients, we included 357 with a zero calcium score in the study. Information regarding patient age, sex, coronary risk factors, and symptom status were recorded. Coronary calcium-scoring scans were followed by CTCA. The calcium scores were calculated, and the presence of noncalcified plaques and significant stenoses (>50% of vessel diameter) was evaluated.
Of the 357 patients with a zero calcium score, 37 (10.36%) had atherosclerotic plaques; 9 patients (2.52%) had significant coronary stenosis. Among coronary risk factors, only diabetes mellitus was significantly correlated with any risk factors (presence of atherosclerosis and obstructive coronary artery disease; P = .030 and .013, respectively).
Although CAC scoring is a safe and a reliable test to exclude obstructive coronary artery disease, the absence of CAC does not definitively exclude the presence of atherosclerosis. CTCA is a more appropriate method for determining the atheroma burden.
冠状动脉钙化(CAC)是动脉粥样硬化的一项特异性指标及独立危险因素;然而,钙化积分可能会遗漏具有临床意义的非钙化斑块。本研究旨在确定冠状动脉钙化积分(CAC)为零的患者在计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)检查时冠状动脉斑块的存在情况及范围,并评估危险因素和症状状态对非钙化斑块存在情况的影响。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了2006年10月至2011年11月期间连续842例患者的病例。其中,我们将357例钙化积分为零的患者纳入研究。记录患者的年龄、性别、冠状动脉危险因素及症状状态等信息。在进行冠状动脉钙化积分扫描后进行CTCA检查。计算钙化积分,并评估非钙化斑块及显著狭窄(血管直径狭窄>50%)的存在情况。
在357例钙化积分为零的患者中,37例(10.36%)存在动脉粥样硬化斑块;9例(2.52%)存在显著冠状动脉狭窄。在冠状动脉危险因素中,只有糖尿病与任何危险因素(动脉粥样硬化和阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的存在)显著相关(分别为P = 0.030和0.013)。
尽管CAC积分是排除阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的一种安全可靠的检查方法,但CAC阴性并不能明确排除动脉粥样硬化的存在。CTCA是确定动脉粥样硬化负荷的更合适方法。