早期目标导向性复苏的新试验：三部和声还是不和谐？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The new trials of early goal-directed resuscitation: three-part harmony or disharmony?

作者信息

Russell James A, Vincent Jean-Louis

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1867-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3068-8. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-013-3068-8

PMID:23958740

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The new trials of early goal-directed resuscitation: three-part harmony or disharmony?早期目标导向性复苏的新试验：三部和声还是不和谐？

Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1867-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3068-8. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

Harmonizing international trials of early goal-directed resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock: methodology of ProCESS, ARISE, and ProMISe.协调严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期目标导向复苏的国际试验：ProCESS、ARISE 和 ProMISe 方法。

Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1760-75. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3024-7. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

Early goal-directed therapy of septic shock: we honestly remain skeptical.感染性休克的早期目标导向治疗：老实说，我们仍持怀疑态度。

Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):994-5; author reply 995. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000257481.37623.3b.

[Management of neonatal sepsis and septic shock].[新生儿败血症和感染性休克的管理]

Przegl Epidemiol. 2006;60(1):119-26.

Bench-to-bedside review: Resuscitation in the emergency department.从 bench 到床边的综述：急诊科的复苏

Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):170-6. doi: 10.1186/cc2986. Epub 2004 Oct 20.

The end of early-goal directed therapy?早期目标导向治疗的终结？

Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):292-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.039. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

Perspectives on perfusion monitoring in septic shock after the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial.ANDROMEDA-SHOCK试验后脓毒症休克中灌注监测的观点

Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Dec;43(9):578-581. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Nov 3.

Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.早期目标导向治疗在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗中的应用

N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1368-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307.

Clinical effectiveness and early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock.

Chest. 2008 Feb;133(2):584; author reply 584-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1916.

Protocol-Based Resuscitation for Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies.基于方案的感染性休克复苏：随机试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析

Yonsei Med J. 2016 Sep;57(5):1260-70. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1260.

引用本文的文献

What comes after the Early Goal Directed Therapy for sepsis era?

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):3514-3517. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.27.

Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期目标导向治疗：与ProCESS、ProMISe和ARISE研究的见解及比较

Crit Care. 2016 Jul 1;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1288-3.

Effect of early goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.早期目标导向治疗对严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 1;6(3):e008330. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008330.

本文引用的文献

Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1760-75. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3024-7. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study.美国和欧洲重症监护病房中存活脓毒症运动的结果：一项前瞻性队列研究。

Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Dec;12(12):919-24. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70239-6. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

Early antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期抗菌治疗。

Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010 Sep;12(5):336-44. doi: 10.1007/s11908-010-0128-x.

Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.多巴胺与去甲肾上腺素治疗休克的比较。

N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.

Relative hyperlactatemia and hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective multi-centre study.危重症患者相对高乳酸血症与住院死亡率的关系：一项回顾性多中心研究。

Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R25. doi: 10.1186/cc8888. Epub 2010 Feb 24.

Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial.乳酸清除率与中心静脉血氧饱和度作为早期脓毒症治疗目标的比较：一项随机临床试验。

JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):739-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.158.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.拯救脓毒症运动：以严重脓毒症为目标的基于国际指南的绩效改进计划的结果。

Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):367-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc.

Effectiveness of treatments for severe sepsis: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.严重脓毒症治疗的有效性：一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov 1;180(9):861-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200812-1912OC. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis.早期乳酸清除率作为疑似脓毒症患者生存决定因素的多中心研究。

Shock. 2009 Jul;32(1):35-9. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e3181971d47.

Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster.《拯救脓毒症运动严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克指南》的实施：我们可以更快推进。

J Crit Care. 2008 Dec;23(4):455-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.003. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验