Mayne A I W, Perry D C, Bruce C E
Department of Paediatric Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK,
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1107-10. doi: 10.1007/s00590-013-1292-0. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
Displaced paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures pose a significant risk of neurovascular injury and consequently have traditionally been treated as a surgical emergency. Recently, the need for emergency surgery has been questioned. We wished to analyse our experience at a large UK tertiary paediatric trauma centre.
A retrospective case note review was performed on patients with Gartland Grades 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures observed in a 2-year period from July 2008 to July 2010. We divided children into those treated before 12 h (early surgery) and after 12 h (delayed surgery). Analysis was undertaken using Fisher's exact test.
Of the 137 patients, 115 were included in the study; median time-to-surgery was 15:30 (range 2:45-62:50); thirty-nine children were treated before 12 h and 76 patients after. In the early surgery group, three children (7.7%) developed a superficial pin-site infection, four children (10.3%) required open reduction, five children (12.8%) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury, and two children (5%) required reoperation. In the delayed surgery group, one child (1.3%) had a superficial pin-site infection, four children (5.3%) required open reduction, seven children (9.2%) sustained an iatrogenic nerve injury, and two children (2.6%) reoperation. Bivariate analysis of our data using Fisher's exact t test revealed no statistically significant difference between early and delayed surgery groups with regard to infection rates (p = 0.1), iatrogenic nerve injury (p = 0.53) or need for open reduction (p = 0.44).
Our results indicate that delayed surgery appears to offer a safe management approach in the treatment of displaced supracondylar fractures, but it is important that cases are carefully evaluated on an individual basis. These results indicate that patient transfer to a specialist paediatric centre, often with consequent surgical delay, is a safe management option and also negates the obligation to carry out these procedures at night.
小儿肱骨髁上骨折移位会带来显著的神经血管损伤风险,因此传统上一直将其视为外科急症进行治疗。最近,急诊手术的必要性受到了质疑。我们希望分析我们在英国一家大型三级儿科创伤中心的经验。
对2008年7月至2010年7月这两年间观察到的Gartland 2级和3级肱骨髁上骨折患者进行回顾性病例记录审查。我们将儿童分为在12小时内接受治疗的(早期手术)和在12小时后接受治疗的(延迟手术)。使用Fisher精确检验进行分析。
137例患者中,115例纳入研究;手术中位时间为15:30(范围2:45 - 62:50);39名儿童在12小时内接受治疗,76名患者在12小时后接受治疗。在早期手术组中,3名儿童(7.7%)发生浅表针道感染,4名儿童(10.3%)需要切开复位,5名儿童(12.8%)发生医源性神经损伤,2名儿童(5%)需要再次手术。在延迟手术组中,1名儿童(1.3%)发生浅表针道感染,4名儿童(5.3%)需要切开复位,7名儿童(9.2%)发生医源性神经损伤,2名儿童(2.6%)需要再次手术。使用Fisher精确t检验对我们的数据进行双变量分析显示,早期和延迟手术组在感染率(p = 0.1)、医源性神经损伤(p = 0.53)或切开复位需求(p = 0.44)方面没有统计学上的显著差异。
我们的结果表明,延迟手术似乎为移位肱骨髁上骨折的治疗提供了一种安全的管理方法,但重要的是要根据个体情况仔细评估病例。这些结果表明,将患者转诊至专科儿科中心,通常会导致手术延迟,是一种安全的管理选择,也消除了在夜间进行这些手术的义务。