Suppr超能文献

影像引导还是依赖体表解剖?诊断性心导管插入术中股动脉穿刺采用透视引导与解剖标志的比较。一项随机对照试验。

Imaging or trusting on surface anatomy? A comparison between fluoroscopic guidance and anatomic landmarks for femoral artery access in diagnostic cardiac catheterization. A randomized control trial.

作者信息

Chinikar Madjid, Ahmadi Azam, Heidarzadeh Abtin, Sadeghipour Parham

出版信息

Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2014 Jan;29(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s12928-013-0203-y.

Abstract

We performed a randomized controlled trial to test the potential benefits of fluoroscopic-guided femoral artery puncture. Observational studies showed a consistent relationship between common femoral artery (CFA) and the head of femur. Fluoroscopy locating the femoral head may increase the accuracy of femoral puncture and consequently decrease the vascular complication. Despite these theoretical benefits, we have no sufficient evidence to verify its advantages. Patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization were randomized into fluoroscopic and anatomic method groups. Of total of 609 patients participated in this study, 305 and 304 patients were assigned to fluoroscopic and anatomic method groups, respectively. Fluoroscopy significantly increases the puncture over the femoral head (96.7 vs. 82.3 %, p value 0.001) and also the fluoroscopic method increased CFA puncture significantly (93.8 vs. 87.5 %, p value 0.012). The combined end point of “proper” femoral puncture (CFA puncture over the femoral head) was highly significant in our fluoroscopy-guided method (91.8 vs. 75.7 %, p value <0.0001). Hematoma was the only vascular complication trough the study (2.6 % of patients) but no significant difference was seen between the two groups. In conclusion, our study showed the efficacy of fluoroscopy in increasing the proper femoral artery puncture, and although it did not show significant improvement in vascular complications, the method should be regard as an accurate guide for femoral access.

摘要

我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以测试透视引导下股动脉穿刺的潜在益处。观察性研究表明股总动脉(CFA)与股骨头之间存在一致的关系。透视定位股骨头可能会提高股动脉穿刺的准确性,从而减少血管并发症。尽管有这些理论上的益处,但我们没有足够的证据来证实其优势。接受诊断性心导管检查的患者被随机分为透视组和解剖法组。在参与本研究的609例患者中,分别有305例和304例患者被分配到透视组和解剖法组。透视显著增加了在股骨头上方的穿刺(96.7%对82.3%,p值0.001),并且透视法也显著增加了股总动脉穿刺(93.8%对87.5%,p值0.012)。在我们的透视引导方法中,“正确的”股动脉穿刺(在股骨头上方进行股总动脉穿刺)的联合终点非常显著(91.8%对75.7%,p值<0.0001)。血肿是整个研究中唯一的血管并发症(占患者的2.6%),但两组之间没有显著差异。总之,我们的研究表明透视在增加正确的股动脉穿刺方面的有效性,并且尽管它在血管并发症方面没有显示出显著改善,但该方法应被视为股动脉穿刺的准确指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验