• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咬痕分析中覆盖层生成方法的比较研究。

A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.

作者信息

Khatri Mihir, Daniel Mariappan Jonathan, Srinivasan Subramanian Vasudevan

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mahatma Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, (Government of Puducherry Institution), Indira Nagar, Gorimedu, Pondicherry, India.

出版信息

J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):16-21. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.114550.

DOI:10.4103/0975-1475.114550
PMID:23960410
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3746467/
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the best method of overlay generation out of the three methods, i.e., manual, photocopying, and computer assisted method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Impressions of maxillary and mandibular arches of 25 individuals participating in the study were made and dental study models were prepared. Overlay production was done by manual, photocopying, and computer assisted methods. Finally, the overlays obtained by each method were compared.

RESULTS

Kruskal Wallis ANOVA H test was used for the comparison of manual, photocopying, and computer assisted overlay generation methods. H value being highest in case of computer assisted overlays, thus, making it the best method of overlay generation out of the three methods.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the method of computer assisted overlay generation is the best among the three methods used in our study.

摘要

目的

评估三种方法（即手工法、复印法和计算机辅助法）中生成覆盖物的最佳方法。

材料与方法

对参与研究的25名个体的上颌和下颌牙弓进行印模，并制作牙科研究模型。通过手工法、复印法和计算机辅助法制作覆盖物。最后，对每种方法获得的覆盖物进行比较。

结果

采用Kruskal Wallis方差分析H检验对手工法、复印法和计算机辅助覆盖物生成方法进行比较。计算机辅助覆盖物的H值最高，因此使其成为三种方法中生成覆盖物的最佳方法。

结论

我们得出结论，在我们研究中使用的三种方法中，计算机辅助覆盖物生成方法是最佳的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/e7a30b76b43a/JFDS-5-16-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/cc7d29406606/JFDS-5-16-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/d673ae08973d/JFDS-5-16-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/2fbf0986ae92/JFDS-5-16-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/6d80e6d611eb/JFDS-5-16-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/1f75027d6dc2/JFDS-5-16-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/4e0e366415d6/JFDS-5-16-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/e770a38d5142/JFDS-5-16-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/57606cb2a080/JFDS-5-16-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/f9f7c8ee3f00/JFDS-5-16-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/6de71257db71/JFDS-5-16-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/d2fec50a8764/JFDS-5-16-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/e7a30b76b43a/JFDS-5-16-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/cc7d29406606/JFDS-5-16-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/d673ae08973d/JFDS-5-16-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/2fbf0986ae92/JFDS-5-16-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/6d80e6d611eb/JFDS-5-16-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/1f75027d6dc2/JFDS-5-16-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/4e0e366415d6/JFDS-5-16-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/e770a38d5142/JFDS-5-16-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/57606cb2a080/JFDS-5-16-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/f9f7c8ee3f00/JFDS-5-16-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/6de71257db71/JFDS-5-16-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/d2fec50a8764/JFDS-5-16-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d13e/3746467/e7a30b76b43a/JFDS-5-16-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative study of overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.咬痕分析中覆盖层生成方法的比较研究。
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):16-21. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.114550.
2
A comparative study between xerographic, computer-assisted overlay generation and animated-superimposition methods in bite mark analyses.静电复印法、计算机辅助叠加生成法与动画叠加法在咬痕分析中的比较研究。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016 Sep;22:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
3
A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.咬痕分析中三种常用二维叠加生成方法的比较研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017 Sep-Dec;21(3):442-446. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_155_15.
4
Computer-based method of bite mark analysis: A benchmark in forensic dentistry?基于计算机的咬痕分析方法：法医牙科学的一个基准？
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Jan-Apr;8(1):32-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.176944.
5
Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study.食物物质咬痕分析的准确性：一项对比研究。
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015 Sep-Dec;7(3):222-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.172442.
6
Envelopment technique and topographic overlays in bite mark analysis.咬痕分析中的包绕技术和地形叠加图
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015 Sep-Dec;7(3):184-8. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.172427.
7
Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts.牙科研究模型中五种常用二维人类咬痕叠加制作方法的比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 May-Jun;22(3):493. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.87079.
8
A comparative assessment of bite marks in analyzing the overlay generation using styrofoam sheet and modeling wax with the dental casts as one of the adjuncts for archiving the forensic records: An study.使用聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料片和模型蜡分析叠加生成时咬痕的比较评估，并将牙模作为存档法医记录的辅助手段之一：一项研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018 Jan-Apr;22(1):132-137. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_141_17.
9
Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.咬痕叠加的准确性：五种从嫌疑人牙列制作样本的常用方法的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 1998 Mar;43(2):362-7.
10
[Analysis of bite marks].[咬痕分析]
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2005;60(3):203-19.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Radiographic/Digital Radiography Technology along with Biological Agents in Human Identification.口腔 X 光摄影/数字 X 光摄影技术与生物制剂在人类识别中的应用。
Scanning. 2022 Jan 18;2022:5265912. doi: 10.1155/2022/5265912. eCollection 2022.
2
Digitization in forensic odontology: A paradigm shift in forensic investigations.法医牙科学中的数字化：法医调查的范式转变。
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019 Jan-Apr;11(1):5-10. doi: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_55_19.
3
A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts.牙科研究模型中五种常用二维人类咬痕叠加制作方法的比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 May-Jun;22(3):493. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.87079.
2
The examination and identification of bite marks in foods using 3D scanning and 3D comparison methods.利用 3D 扫描和 3D 比较方法对食物中咬痕的检验和识别。
Int J Legal Med. 2012 Jan;126(1):89-95. doi: 10.1007/s00414-011-0580-7. Epub 2011 May 24.
3
Dental anomalies and their value in human identification: a case report.
咬痕分析中三种常用二维叠加生成方法的比较研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017 Sep-Dec;21(3):442-446. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_155_15.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2010 Dec 1;28(1):39-43.
4
A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification.法医咬痕鉴定中匹配概率估计的一个框架。
J Forensic Sci. 2011 Jan;56 Suppl 1:S83-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01571.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
5
Effectiveness of comparison overlays generated with DentalPrint software in bite mark analysis.使用DentalPrint软件生成的对比叠加图在咬痕分析中的有效性。
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Jan;52(1):151-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00321.x.
6
[An experimental study on human bitemarks digital analysis and its accuracy].[人体咬痕数字分析及其准确性的实验研究]
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Oct;22(5):918-21.
7
Computer-based production of comparison overlays from 3D-scanned dental casts for bite mark analysis.基于计算机从三维扫描牙模生成比较叠加图用于咬痕分析。
J Forensic Sci. 2005 Jan;50(1):127-33.
8
A comparative reliability analysis of computer-generated bitemark overlays.计算机生成的咬痕叠加图的比较可靠性分析
J Forensic Sci. 2005 Mar;50(2):400-5.
9
A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.用于人类咬痕分析的直接方法与间接方法之间的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Jan;49(1):111-8.
10
Comparison of bitemarks left in foodstuffs with models of the suspects' dentitions as a means of identifying a perpetrator.将食品上留下的咬痕与嫌疑人牙列模型进行比对，以此作为识别犯罪者的一种手段。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2000 Dec;18(2):27-31.