• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料片和模型蜡分析叠加生成时咬痕的比较评估,并将牙模作为存档法医记录的辅助手段之一:一项研究。

A comparative assessment of bite marks in analyzing the overlay generation using styrofoam sheet and modeling wax with the dental casts as one of the adjuncts for archiving the forensic records: An study.

作者信息

Zainab H, Pramod J, Hugar D, Sultana A

机构信息

Department of Oral Pathology, Al Badar Dental College and Hospital, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018 Jan-Apr;22(1):132-137. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_141_17.

DOI:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_141_17
PMID:29731571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5917522/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bite mark evidence is unique to an individual and plays an important role in the legal system. There has always been the need to develop newer materials for bite mark analysis that will have excellent reproducibility as well as reliability.

AIM

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of styrofoam sheets and modeling wax with time-dependent changes when compared to the routine dental cast models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study included thirty volunteers and their bite marks were taken on the styrofoam and wax sheet materials that were traced on the transparent sheet and evaluation of the bite marks on the two materials were carried out at an interval of 1 day for 3 alternate days and grades were given, respectively. ANOVA test and -test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The comparison between the styrofoam sheet and wax sheet with the dental cast on day 1 proved to be excellent materials for reproducibility, but from day 3 onward, the styrofoam sheet showed changes in bite registered area; whereas wax sheet maintained its registered dimensions.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that bite mark registration on styrofoam and wax sheet had excellent reproducibility on day 1, which makes these two materials advantageous in bite mark registration and overlay generation on the same day, whereas on day 3 and day 5, the styrofoam sheet showed changes with respect to bite registration and overlay generation, which questions the reliability of the styrofoam sheet for long-term record keeping when compared with the modeling wax.

摘要

引言

咬痕证据具有个体独特性,在法律体系中发挥着重要作用。一直以来都需要开发用于咬痕分析的新材料,这些材料应具有出色的可重复性和可靠性。

目的

本研究旨在评估与常规牙模相比,泡沫聚苯乙烯片材和造型蜡随时间变化的效果。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了30名志愿者,在泡沫聚苯乙烯和蜡片材料上获取他们的咬痕,并将其描摹在透明片材上,每隔1天对这两种材料上的咬痕进行评估,共进行3个交替日,分别给出等级。采用方差分析和t检验进行统计分析。

结果

在第1天,泡沫聚苯乙烯片材和蜡片与牙模之间的比较证明是具有出色可重复性的材料,但从第3天起,泡沫聚苯乙烯片材的咬痕记录面积出现变化;而蜡片保持其记录尺寸。

结论

该研究得出结论,在第1天,在泡沫聚苯乙烯和蜡片上记录咬痕具有出色的可重复性,这使得这两种材料在同一天进行咬痕记录和叠加生成方面具有优势,而在第3天和第5天,泡沫聚苯乙烯片材在咬痕记录和叠加生成方面出现变化,与造型蜡相比,这对泡沫聚苯乙烯片材用于长期记录保存的可靠性提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/562e592c4756/JOMFP-22-132-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/7edd7371a54f/JOMFP-22-132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/2ef3b89d051f/JOMFP-22-132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/5e66abe56f89/JOMFP-22-132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/e038234ea1da/JOMFP-22-132-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/78dccea1fae9/JOMFP-22-132-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/e8458796b1f2/JOMFP-22-132-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/9fd6c035ba9d/JOMFP-22-132-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/562e592c4756/JOMFP-22-132-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/7edd7371a54f/JOMFP-22-132-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/2ef3b89d051f/JOMFP-22-132-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/5e66abe56f89/JOMFP-22-132-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/e038234ea1da/JOMFP-22-132-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/78dccea1fae9/JOMFP-22-132-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/e8458796b1f2/JOMFP-22-132-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/9fd6c035ba9d/JOMFP-22-132-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/5917522/562e592c4756/JOMFP-22-132-g013.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative assessment of bite marks in analyzing the overlay generation using styrofoam sheet and modeling wax with the dental casts as one of the adjuncts for archiving the forensic records: An study.使用聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料片和模型蜡分析叠加生成时咬痕的比较评估,并将牙模作为存档法医记录的辅助手段之一:一项研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2018 Jan-Apr;22(1):132-137. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_141_17.
2
A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.咬痕分析中三种常用二维叠加生成方法的比较研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017 Sep-Dec;21(3):442-446. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_155_15.
3
A comparative study between xerographic, computer-assisted overlay generation and animated-superimposition methods in bite mark analyses.静电复印法、计算机辅助叠加生成法与动画叠加法在咬痕分析中的比较研究。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2016 Sep;22:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
4
Computer-based method of bite mark analysis: A benchmark in forensic dentistry?基于计算机的咬痕分析方法:法医牙科学的一个基准?
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Jan-Apr;8(1):32-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.176944.
5
[Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].[使用二维和三维方法对比咬痕与牙齿特征]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2011 Apr-Jun;61(2):107-14.
6
Analysis of time-dependent changes in Bitemarks on Styrofoam sheets.聚苯乙烯泡沫板上咬痕的时间依赖性变化分析。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S77-80. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152948.
7
Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts.牙科研究模型中五种常用二维人类咬痕叠加制作方法的比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 May-Jun;22(3):493. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.87079.
8
Comparative study to evaluate the accuracy of polyether occlusal bite registration material and occlusal registration wax as a guide for occlusal reduction during tooth preparation.比较研究以评估聚醚咬合记录材料和咬合记录蜡作为牙齿预备期间咬合降低指导的准确性。
Indian J Dent Res. 2013 Nov-Dec;24(6):730-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.127622.
9
[Analysis of bite marks].[咬痕分析]
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2005;60(3):203-19.
10
Comparison of the bite mark pattern and intercanine distance between humans and dogs.人类与狗之间咬痕模式和犬齿间距离的比较。
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015 Sep-Dec;7(3):175-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.172419.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Radiographic/Digital Radiography Technology along with Biological Agents in Human Identification.口腔 X 光摄影/数字 X 光摄影技术与生物制剂在人类识别中的应用。
Scanning. 2022 Jan 18;2022:5265912. doi: 10.1155/2022/5265912. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of time-dependent changes in Bitemarks on Styrofoam sheets.聚苯乙烯泡沫板上咬痕的时间依赖性变化分析。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Mar;6(Suppl 1):S77-80. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.152948.
2
Analysis and identification of bite marks in forensic casework.法医案件中咬痕的分析与鉴定。
Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013 Sep;12(3):127-31.
3
A quantitative method for comparing human dentition with tooth marks using three-dimensional technology and geometric morphometric analysis.一种使用三维技术和几何形态计量分析来比较人类牙列与牙印的定量方法。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Jul;72(5):331-6. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.826383. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
4
Dental anomalies and their value in human identification: a case report.
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2010 Dec 1;28(1):39-43.
5
Biomechanical factors in human dermal bitemarks in a cadaver model.人体尸体模型中皮肤咬痕的生物力学因素
J Forensic Sci. 2009 Jan;54(1):167-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00908.x. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
6
A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.用于人类咬痕分析的直接方法与间接方法之间的比较。
J Forensic Sci. 2004 Jan;49(1):111-8.
7
Bitemarks in forensic odontology.法医牙科学中的咬痕
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1998 Dec;16(2):30-4.
8
Comparison of bitemarks in foodstuffs by computer imaging: a case report.通过计算机成像对食品上咬痕的比较:一例报告
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 1994 Dec;12(2):41-4.