Suppr超能文献

在植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入过程中,安全有效地使用清醒镇静进行除颤阈值测试。

Safe and effective use of conscious sedation for defibrillation threshold testing during ICD implantation.

作者信息

Al Fagih Ahmed, Al Shurafa Hitham, Al Ghamdi Saleh, Dagriri Khaled, Al Khadra Ayman

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2010 Oct;22(4):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Aug 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over a period of years general anesthesia has been a standard anesthetic technique for defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing at the time of implant. DFT testing without general anesthesia cover has gained limited acceptance. Use of local anesthesia combined with deep sedation for DFT testing might facilitate and simplify these procedures by reducing the procedural time, staff time, avoiding inefficient service in organizing anesthetic cover; thereby improving patient compliance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of conscious sedation for DFT testing during Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) implantation.

METHOD

Data of 87 non-selected patients who achieved adequate sedation with titrated doses of midazolam and pethidine were analyzed retrospectively. These medications were administered by a circulating nurse under the supervision of the implanting physicians. All hemodynamic measures, treatment and complications were monitored and recorded throughout the procedure.

RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of data from 87 patients who underwent ICD implantation and DFT testing under conscious sedation at our center was reported. The mean dose of midazolam and pethidine administered was 4.9 ± 1.8 and 47.7 ± 20 mg, respectively. During the period of conscious sedation, no patient depicted episode of sustained apnea. No major complication or mortality was reported.

CONCLUSION

Use of conscious sedation as an alternative to the use of general anesthesia for DFT testing during ICD implantation is found to be feasible, safe and effective, with an added advantage of reduced procedural time and improved patient compliance.

摘要

背景

多年来,全身麻醉一直是植入时除颤阈值(DFT)测试的标准麻醉技术。不采用全身麻醉覆盖的DFT测试的接受度有限。在DFT测试中使用局部麻醉联合深度镇静可能会通过减少操作时间、工作人员时间、避免安排麻醉覆盖时的低效服务来简化这些操作,从而提高患者的依从性。

目的

本研究的目的是评估在植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入期间进行DFT测试时清醒镇静的可行性、安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性分析87例未经过筛选的患者的数据,这些患者通过滴定剂量的咪达唑仑和哌替啶实现了充分镇静。这些药物由巡回护士在植入医生的监督下给药。在整个手术过程中监测并记录所有血流动力学指标、治疗情况和并发症。

结果

报告了对在本中心接受清醒镇静下ICD植入和DFT测试的87例患者的数据进行的回顾性分析。咪达唑仑和哌替啶的平均给药剂量分别为4.9±1.8mg和47.7±20mg。在清醒镇静期间,没有患者出现持续呼吸暂停发作。未报告重大并发症或死亡情况。

结论

发现在ICD植入期间使用清醒镇静替代全身麻醉进行DFT测试是可行、安全且有效的,还有减少操作时间和提高患者依从性的额外优势。

相似文献

8
Electrophysiologist-implanted transvenous cardioverter defibrillators using local versus general anesthesia.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):96-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00654.x.

本文引用的文献

3
How to manage the patient with a high defibrillation threshold.如何管理高除颤阈值患者。
Heart Rhythm. 2006 Apr;3(4):492-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.12.023.
4
Outpatient cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias: efficacy, safety, and costs.
Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):233-8. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.112.
6
Effect of general anesthesia on the defibrillation energy requirement in patients undergoing defibrillator implantation.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Dec;3(4):325-8. doi: 10.1023/a:1009831802964.
8
Influence of anaesthesia on defibrillation threshold.
Anaesthesia. 1998 Dec;53(12):1156-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00643.x.
10
Safety of nurse-administered deep sedation for defibrillator implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Apr;7(4):301-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00531.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验