Suppr超能文献

皮下植入式心律转复除颤器植入术的麻醉:来自美国一组医生临床经验的观点。

Anesthesia for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Perspectives from the clinical experience of a U.S. panel of physicians.

作者信息

Essandoh Michael K, Mark George E, Aasbo Johan D, Joyner Charles A, Sharma Saumya, Decena Beningo F, Bolin Eric D, Weiss Raul, Burke Martin C, McClernon Timothy R, Daoud Emile G, Gold Michael R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Jul;41(7):807-816. doi: 10.1111/pace.13364. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Worldwide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) for preventing sudden cardiac death continues to increase, as longer-term evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD expands. As a relatively new technology, comprehensive anesthesia guidance for the management of patients undergoing S-ICD placement is lacking. This article presents advantages and disadvantages of different periprocedural sedation and anesthesia options for S-ICD implants including general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, regional anesthesia, and nonanesthesia personnel administered sedation and analgesia.

METHODS

Guidance, for approaches to anesthesia care during S-ICD implantation, is presented based upon literature review and consensus of a panel of high-volume S-ICD implanters, a regional anesthesiologist, and a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist with significant S-ICD experience. The panel developed suggested actions for perioperative sedation, anesthesia, surgical practices, and a decision algorithm for S-ICD implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

While S-ICD implantation currently requires higher sedation than transvenous ICD systems, the panel consensus is that general anesthesia is not required or is obligatory for the majority of patients for the experienced S-ICD implanter. The focus of the implanting physician and the anesthesia services should be to maximize patient comfort and take into consideration patient-specific comorbidities, with a low threshold to consult the anesthesiology team.

摘要

背景与目的

随着表明皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)安全性和有效性的长期证据不断增加,全球范围内用于预防心源性猝死的S-ICD的采用率持续上升。作为一项相对较新的技术,目前缺乏针对接受S-ICD植入患者管理的全面麻醉指南。本文介绍了S-ICD植入围手术期不同镇静和麻醉选择的优缺点,包括全身麻醉、监护下麻醉管理、区域麻醉以及由非麻醉人员实施的镇静和镇痛。

方法

基于文献综述以及一组大量实施S-ICD植入手术的医生、一名区域麻醉医生和一名有丰富S-ICD经验的心胸麻醉医生的共识,给出了S-ICD植入期间麻醉护理方法的指南。该小组制定了围手术期镇静、麻醉、手术操作的建议措施以及S-ICD植入的决策算法。

结论

虽然目前S-ICD植入比经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器系统需要更高的镇静水平,但该小组的共识是,对于经验丰富的S-ICD植入医生而言,大多数患者不需要全身麻醉或并非必须进行全身麻醉。植入医生和麻醉服务的重点应是最大限度地提高患者舒适度,并考虑患者的特定合并症,且咨询麻醉团队的门槛要低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验