Gigli Anna, Warren Joan L, Yabroff K Robin, Francisci Silvia, Stedman Margaret, Guzzinati Stefano, Giusti Francesco, Miccinesi Guido, Crocetti Emanuele, Angiolini Catia, Mariotto Angela
Istituto di Ricerche sulla Popolazione e le Politiche Sociali, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Palestro 32-00185 Roma, Italy.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):88-98. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt006.
Cancer is a major component of health-care expenditures in most developed countries. The costs of cancer care are expected to increase due to rising incidence (as the population ages) and increasing use of targeted anticancer therapies. However, epidemiological analysis of patterns of care may be required prior to empirically well-grounded cost analyses. Additionally, comparisons of care between health-care delivery systems and countries can identify opportunities to improve practice. They can also increase understanding of patient outcomes and economic consequences of differences in policies related to cancer screening, treatment, and programs of care. In this study, we compared patterns of colorectal cancer treatment during the first year following diagnosis in two cohorts of elderly patients from some areas of Italy and the United States using cancer registry linked to administrative data. We evaluated hospital use, initial treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation), and timeliness of surgery and adjuvant therapy, taking into account patient characteristics and clinical features, such as stage at diagnosis and the cancer subsite. We observed greater use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III and IV colon cancer patients and adjuvant therapy in all stages of rectal cancer patients in the US cohort. We found a higher rate of open surgeries in the Italian cohort, a similar rate of hospitalization, but a higher number of hospital days in the Italian cohort. However, in spite of structural differences between the United States and Italy in health-care organization and delivery as well as in data collection, patterns of care and the timing of care in the year after diagnosis are generally similar among patients within stage of disease at diagnosis. Comparative studies of the costs associated with patterns of cancer care will be important for future research.
在大多数发达国家,癌症是医疗保健支出的主要组成部分。由于发病率上升(随着人口老龄化)以及靶向抗癌疗法的使用增加,癌症治疗成本预计会上升。然而,在进行有充分实证依据的成本分析之前,可能需要对治疗模式进行流行病学分析。此外,对医疗保健提供系统和国家之间的治疗情况进行比较,可以发现改进医疗实践的机会。它们还可以增进对患者预后以及与癌症筛查、治疗和护理计划相关政策差异所产生的经济后果的理解。在本研究中,我们使用与行政数据相链接的癌症登记处,比较了来自意大利和美国某些地区的两组老年患者在确诊后第一年的结直肠癌治疗模式。我们评估了医院利用情况、初始治疗(手术、化疗和放疗)以及手术和辅助治疗的及时性,同时考虑了患者特征和临床特征,如诊断时的分期和癌症亚部位。我们观察到,在美国队列中,III期和IV期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的使用更多,直肠癌患者在所有阶段辅助治疗的使用更多。我们发现意大利队列中的开放手术率更高,住院率相似,但意大利队列中的住院天数更多。然而,尽管美国和意大利在医疗保健组织与提供以及数据收集方面存在结构差异,但在诊断时处于相同疾病阶段的患者中,诊断后一年的治疗模式和治疗时间总体上相似。对癌症治疗模式相关成本的比较研究对未来研究将很重要。