Chadha Gurpreet K, Ahmadieh Azadeh, Kumar Satish, Sedghizadeh Parish P
Division of Periodontology, Diagnostic Sciences and Dental Hygiene, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Aug;39(4):510-20. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00234.
Bisphosphonate (BP) drugs are a commonly prescribed group of medications used in the treatment of metabolic and oncologic bone disorders. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review in order to evaluate whether patients on BP therapy are appropriate candidates for dental implants as compared to patients not taking BP drugs with respect to successful implant osseointegration and the risk of developing bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Based on the current literature, a history of oral or intravenous BP use is not an absolute contraindication for dental implant placement, and dental implants can osseointegrate successfully in this patient population. Importantly, the studies currently available on this topic are of moderate to weak strength of evidence with inherent bias and limitations, and hence results must be interpreted in this context. Well-controlled studies with higher strength of evidence and larger population sizes are required to address this topic more accurately in the future.
双膦酸盐(BP)药物是一组常用于治疗代谢性和肿瘤性骨疾病的处方药。本研究的目的是进行一项系统评价,以评估与未服用BP药物的患者相比,接受BP治疗的患者在种植体成功骨整合以及发生双膦酸盐相关颌骨坏死风险方面是否是牙种植体的合适候选者。根据目前的文献,口服或静脉使用BP的病史并非牙种植体植入的绝对禁忌症,并且牙种植体在该患者群体中可以成功骨整合。重要的是,目前关于该主题的研究证据强度为中等至较弱,存在固有偏差和局限性,因此必须在此背景下解释结果。未来需要进行证据强度更高、样本量更大的对照研究,以便更准确地解决这一主题。