Suppr超能文献

布罗卡失语症对一致性错误和词序错误的差异敏感性。

Differential Sensitivity to Errors of Agreement and Word Order in Broca's Aphasia.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 1991 Summer;3(3):258-72. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.258.

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the effect of morphosyntactic violation type on accuracy and processing time in Broca's aphasics engaged in an on-line error detection task. Five agrammatic Broca's aphasic subjects and 15 age-matched control subjects performed grammaticality judgments on auditorily presented grammatical and ungrammatical sentences. Both judgment accuracy and decision time were measured, so that the data revealed not only whether aphasics detected violations, but when they noticed them. The ungrammatical sentences were created by changing quantifiers and auxiliary verbs in one of two ways: substituting one quantifier or auxiliary for another to create agreement errors, or moving the quantifier or auxiliary "downstream" from its proper site to create word order errors. Also, the position of the violation in the sentence (early versus late) as well as the distance relationships among sentence elements involved in the violation (local versus global) were manipulated. Results suggest that aphasic subjects retain some sensitivity to grammaticality, knowledge that they are able to use "online." Performance was also affected by type of violation. Aphasic subjects were less sensitive to agreement violations than they were to violations created by moving the same elements to an illegal position-and this tended to be reflected in decision times as well as accuracy. These results support two conclusions. First, although the performance of aphasic subjects was degraded relative to control subjects, the findings of overall grammaticality sensitivity and relatively rapid decision times suggest that the locus of grammatical impairment in these patients has more to do with the accessing of linguistic information than with loss of linguistic knowledge. Second, the difference between agreement and movement violations provides further evidence that morphological marking is relatively vulnerable in aphasia, compared with the principles that govern word and morpheme ordering.

摘要

摘要 我们研究了形态句法违反类型对从事在线错误检测任务的布罗卡失语症患者的准确性和处理时间的影响。五位语法障碍的布罗卡失语症患者和 15 位年龄匹配的对照组被试者通过听觉呈现语法和不合语法的句子来进行语法判断。测量了判断的准确性和决策时间,这样数据不仅揭示了失语症患者是否检测到了违反规则的情况,还揭示了他们何时注意到了这些情况。通过以下两种方式改变量词和助动词来生成不合语法的句子:用一个量词或助动词代替另一个,从而产生一致错误;或者将量词或助动词“向下游”移动到其适当的位置之外,从而产生词序错误。此外,句子中违反规则的位置(早期与晚期)以及违反规则涉及的句子元素之间的距离关系(局部与全局)也被操纵。结果表明,失语症患者对语法的敏感性有所保留,他们能够“在线”使用这种知识。表现也受到违反规则类型的影响。与将相同元素移动到非法位置产生的违反规则相比,失语症患者对一致违反规则的敏感性较低——这在决策时间和准确性上都有所反映。这些结果支持两个结论。首先,尽管失语症患者的表现相对于对照组有所下降,但整体语法敏感性和相对较快的决策时间的发现表明,这些患者的语法损伤部位更多地与语言信息的获取有关,而不是与语言知识的丧失有关。其次,一致违反规则和移动违反规则之间的差异进一步证明,与支配词和语素排序的原则相比,形态标记在失语症中相对脆弱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验