Department of Intensive Care, Université Catholique de Louvain, Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Avenue Docteur G., Thérasse 1, Yvoir 5530, Belgium.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Patras Rio 26504, Greece.
Ann Intensive Care. 2013 Aug 22;3:28. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-3-28. eCollection 2013.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Transcranial Doppler (TCD) in assessing cerebral perfusion changes in septic patients.
Using TCD, we measured the mean velocity in the middle cerebral artery (VmMCA, cm/sec) and calculated the pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI) and cerebral blood flow index (CBFi = 10*MAP/1.47(PI)) on the first day of patients' admission or on the first day of sepsis development; measurements were repeated on the second day. Sepsis was defined according to standard criteria.
Forty-one patients without any known neurologic deficit treated in our 24-bed Critical Care Unit were assessed (Sepsis Group = 20, Control Group = 21). Examination was feasible in 91% of septic and 85% of non-septic patients (p = 0.89). No difference was found between the two groups in mean age, mean arterial pressure (MAP) or APACHE II score. The pCO2 values were higher in septic patients (46 ± 12 vs. 39 ± 4 mmHg p < 0.01). No statistically significant higher values of VmMCA were found in septic patients (110 ± 34 cm/sec vs. 99 ± 28 cm/sec p = 0.17). Higher values of PI and RI were found in septic patients (1.15 ± 0.25 vs. 0.98 ± 0.16 p < 0.01, 0.64 ± 0.08 vs. 0.59 ± 0.06 p < 0.01, respectively). No statistically significant lower values of CBFi were found in septic patients (497 ± 116 vs. 548 ± 110 p = 0.06).
Our results suggest cerebral vasoconstriction in septic compared to non-septic patients. TCD is an efficient and feasible exam to evaluate changes in cerebral perfusion during sepsis.
本研究旨在评估经颅多普勒(TCD)评估脓毒症患者脑灌注变化的可行性和疗效。
使用 TCD,我们测量大脑中动脉平均速度(VmMCA,cm/sec),并计算搏动指数(PI)、阻力指数(RI)和脑血流指数(CBFi=10*MAP/1.47(PI)),分别在患者入院或脓毒症发生的第一天进行测量;第二天重复测量。根据标准标准定义脓毒症。
在我们的 24 张重症监护病床中评估了 41 名无任何已知神经功能缺陷的患者(脓毒症组=20 例,对照组=21 例)。脓毒症患者中 91%的检查可行,而非脓毒症患者中 85%的检查可行(p=0.89)。两组之间在平均年龄、平均动脉压(MAP)或急性生理与慢性健康评分(APACHE II)方面无差异。脓毒症患者的 pCO2 值更高(46±12 对 39±4mmHg,p<0.01)。脓毒症患者的 VmMCA 值没有明显升高(110±34cm/sec 对 99±28cm/sec,p=0.17)。脓毒症患者的 PI 和 RI 值较高(1.15±0.25 对 0.98±0.16,p<0.01,0.64±0.08 对 0.59±0.06,p<0.01)。脓毒症患者的 CBFi 值没有明显降低(497±116 对 548±110,p=0.06)。
与非脓毒症患者相比,我们的结果表明脓毒症患者存在脑血管收缩。TCD 是评估脓毒症期间脑灌注变化的有效且可行的检查方法。