von Vopelius-Feldt Johannes, Benger Jonathan
Academic Department of Emergency Care, Emergency Department, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Academic Department of Emergency Care, Emergency Department, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2014 Dec;31(12):1009-13. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202895. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
Emergency medical services in the UK are facing the challenge of responding to an increasing number of calls, often for non-emergency care, while also providing critical care to the few severely ill or injured patients. In response, paramedic training in the UK has been extended and there are regional strategies to improve prehospital critical care (PHCC). We describe the clinical competencies of three groups of prehospital providers in the UK with the aim of informing future planning of the delivery of PHCC.
We used a data triangulation approach to obtain lists of competencies for paramedics, critical care paramedics (CCPs) and PHCC physicians of the Great Western Ambulance Service. Data sources were professional guidance documents, equipment available to the provider, log sheets of prehospital care episodes, direct observations and a survey of providers.
We identified 389, 441 and 449 competencies for paramedics, CCPs and PHCC physicians, respectively. Competencies of CCPs and PHCC physicians which exceeded those of paramedics can be arranged in four distinct clusters: induction and maintenance of anaesthesia, procedural sedation, advanced cardiovascular management and complex invasive interventions.
Paramedics possess a considerable number of competencies which allow them to diagnose and treat a variety of conditions. CCPs and PHCC physicians possess a few additional critical care competencies which are potentially life-saving but are required infrequently and can carry significant risks. Concentration of training and clinical exposure for a small group of providers in critical care teams can help optimising benefits and reducing risks of PHCC.
英国的紧急医疗服务面临着应对越来越多呼叫的挑战,其中许多呼叫是关于非紧急护理的,同时还要为少数重症或受伤患者提供重症护理。作为回应,英国的护理人员培训已经扩展,并且有区域战略来改善院前重症护理(PHCC)。我们描述了英国三组院前医疗服务提供者的临床能力,目的是为未来PHCC的提供规划提供参考。
我们采用数据三角测量法来获取大西部救护车服务中心护理人员、重症护理护理人员(CCP)和PHCC医生的能力清单。数据来源包括专业指导文件、提供者可用的设备、院前护理事件记录单、直接观察以及对提供者的调查。
我们分别确定了护理人员、CCP和PHCC医生的389项、441项和449项能力。CCP和PHCC医生超出护理人员的能力可分为四个不同的类别:麻醉诱导与维持、程序性镇静、高级心血管管理和复杂侵入性干预。
护理人员具备大量能力,使他们能够诊断和治疗各种病症。CCP和PHCC医生拥有一些额外的重症护理能力,这些能力可能挽救生命,但使用频率不高且存在重大风险。对重症护理团队中的一小部分提供者进行集中培训和临床接触,有助于优化PHCC的益处并降低风险。