Suppr超能文献

损伤控制性剖腹术后肠瘘和腹腔感染的独立预测因素:来自前瞻性 AAST 开放性腹部登记处的结果。

Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST Open Abdomen registry.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, University of Maryland Medical System, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2013 Oct;148(10):947-54. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2514.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Enterocutaneous fistula (ECF), enteroatmospheric fistula (EAF), and intra-abdominal sepsis/abscess (IAS) are major challenges for surgeons caring for patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma.

OBJECTIVE

To determine independent predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy after trauma, using the AAST Open Abdomen Registry.

DESIGN

The AAST Open Abdomen registry of patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy was used to identify patients who developed ECF, EAF, or IAS and to compare these patients with those without these complications. Univariate analyses were performed to compare these groups of patients. Variables from univariate analyses differing at P < .20 were entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to identify independent risk factors for ECF, EAF, or IAS.

SETTING

Fourteen level I trauma centers.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 517 patients with an open abdomen following damage control laparotomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Complication of ECF, EAF, or IAS.

RESULTS

More patients in the ECF/EAF/IAS group than in the group without these complications underwent bowel resection (63 of 111 patients [57%] vs 133 of 406 patients [33%]; P < .001). Within the first 48 hours after surgery, the ECF/EAF/IAS group received more colloids (P < .03) and total fluids (P < .03) than did the group without these complications. The ECF/EAF/IAS group underwent almost twice as many abdominal reexplorations as did the group without these complications (mean [SD] number, 4.1 [4.1] vs 2.2 [3.4]; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of ECF/EAF/IAS were a large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.56 [95% CI, 1.88-6.76]; P < .001), a total fluid intake at 48 hours of between 5 and 10 L (AOR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.15-3.88]; P = .02) or more than 10 L (AOR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.04-3.57]; P = .04), and an increasing number of reexplorations (AOR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.21]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Large bowel resection, large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an increasing number of abdominal reexplorations were statistically significant predictors of ECF, EAF, or IAS in patients with an open abdomen after damage control laparotomy.

摘要

重要性

肠皮肤瘘(ECF)、肠气瘘(EAF)和腹腔内脓毒症/脓肿(IAS)是创伤后接受损伤控制性剖腹术的患者的外科医生面临的主要挑战。

目的

使用 AAST 开放性腹部登记处,确定创伤后接受损伤控制性剖腹术的患者中发生 ECF、EAF 或 IAS 的独立预测因素。

设计

使用 AAST 开放性腹部登记处,对接受损伤控制性剖腹术后有开放性腹部的患者进行识别,以确定发生 ECF、EAF 或 IAS 的患者,并将这些患者与无这些并发症的患者进行比较。进行单变量分析以比较这些患者组。单变量分析中 P<0.20 的变量被纳入逐步逻辑回归模型,以确定 ECF、EAF 或 IAS 的独立危险因素。

地点

14 个一级创伤中心。

参与者

共 517 例接受损伤控制性剖腹术后有开放性腹部的患者。

主要结局和测量指标

ECF、EAF 或 IAS 的并发症。

结果

与无这些并发症的患者相比,ECF/EAF/IAS 组中有更多的患者接受了肠切除术(111 例患者中有 63 例[57%],406 例患者中有 133 例[33%];P<0.001)。在手术后的前 48 小时内,ECF/EAF/IAS 组接受的胶体(P<0.03)和总液体(P<0.03)均多于无这些并发症的患者。ECF/EAF/IAS 组进行的腹部再探查几乎是无这些并发症的患者的两倍(平均[标准差]次数,4.1[4.1]与 2.2[3.4];P<0.001)。多变量分析后,ECF/EAF/IAS 的独立预测因素是大肠切除术(校正优势比[OR],3.56[95%CI,1.88-6.76];P<0.001)、48 小时内总液体摄入量为 5 至 10 L(OR,2.11[95%CI,1.15-3.88];P=0.02)或更多(OR,1.93[95%CI,1.04-3.57];P=0.04),以及腹部再探查次数的增加(OR,1.14[95%CI,1.06-1.21];P<0.001)。

结论和相关性

大肠切除术、大容量液体复苏和腹部再探查次数的增加是创伤后接受损伤控制性剖腹术的患者发生 ECF、EAF 或 IAS 的统计学显著预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验