• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

80岁及以上急性心肌梗死患者就诊后6个月死亡或再梗死的GRACE评分的有效性。

Validity of the GRACE score for 6-month death or reinfarction after presentation with acute myocardial infarction in patients 80 years of age and older.

作者信息

Luo Jing-guang, Yang Ming, Han Ling, Jia Xiao, Chen Li-wei, Zhao Yan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2013 Nov;24(7):537-41. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000023.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0000000000000023
PMID:23965947
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score provides a prediction of the probability of death and myocardial infarction within 6 months after acute coronary syndrome. Our aim was to detect the validity of the GRACE risk score in predicting 6-month death or reinfarction in Chinese acute myocardial infarction (AMI) inpatients 80 years of age and older between 2003 and 2012.

METHODS

Using the GRACE risk score to predict the combined endpoints of all-cause death or reinfarction within 6 months of AMI, we evaluated its discrimination and calibration by the C-statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 370 patients presenting with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI were included. The GRACE risk score ranged between 181 and 325; death or reinfarction within 6 months of AMI was 49.2%. The GRACE model showed good discrimination overall (C-statistic 0.708, 95% confidence interval: 0.655-0.760, P<0.001) and in patients with non-STEMI (C-statistic 0.756, 95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.823, P<0.001). However, the discriminatory capacity was lower in patients with STEMI (C-statistic 0.645, P=0.001). The calibration was optimal overall (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P=0.398) and in the subgroups (STEMI, P=0.098; non-STEMI, P=0.822). There was a high correlation (R=0.926) between the predicted and the observed 6-month death or reinfarction after AMI.

CONCLUSION

The GRACE score is accurate for determination of 6-month death or reinfarction in Chinese AMI inpatients 80 years of age and older; however, the discrimination and calibration performs less well in patients with STEMI.

摘要

引言与目的

全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)风险评分可预测急性冠状动脉综合征后6个月内的死亡和心肌梗死概率。我们的目的是检测GRACE风险评分对2003年至2012年间80岁及以上中国急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院患者6个月死亡或再梗死的预测效度。

方法

使用GRACE风险评分预测AMI后6个月内全因死亡或再梗死的联合终点,我们分别通过C统计量和Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评估其区分度和校准度。

结果

共纳入370例ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非STEMI患者。GRACE风险评分在181至325之间;AMI后6个月内死亡或再梗死发生率为49.2%。GRACE模型总体显示出良好的区分度(C统计量0.708,95%置信区间:0.655 - 0.760,P<0.001),在非STEMI患者中也是如此(C统计量0.756,95%置信区间:0.690 - 0.823,P<0.001)。然而,STEMI患者的区分能力较低(C统计量0.645,P = 0.001)。总体校准度最佳(Hosmer-Lemeshow,P = 0.398),各亚组也是如此(STEMI,P = 0.098;非STEMI,P = 0.822)。AMI后6个月预测死亡或再梗死与观察到的情况之间存在高度相关性(R = 0.926)。

结论

GRACE评分对于确定80岁及以上中国AMI住院患者6个月死亡或再梗死是准确的;然而,STEMI患者的区分度和校准度表现较差。

相似文献

1
Validity of the GRACE score for 6-month death or reinfarction after presentation with acute myocardial infarction in patients 80 years of age and older.80岁及以上急性心肌梗死患者就诊后6个月死亡或再梗死的GRACE评分的有效性。
Coron Artery Dis. 2013 Nov;24(7):537-41. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000023.
2
Validity of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score in prediction of acute myocardial infarction mortality in hospitalised Chinese patients aged 80 and over.全球急性冠状动脉事件注册风险评分对80岁及以上中国住院患者急性心肌梗死死亡率预测的有效性。
Australas J Ageing. 2014 Dec;33(4):E1-5. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12044. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
3
Validity of the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) acute coronary syndrome prediction model for six month post-discharge death in an independent data set.GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究)急性冠状动脉综合征预测模型对独立数据集中出院后6个月死亡情况的预测效度。
Heart. 2006 Jul;92(7):905-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.073122. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
4
Anaemia to predict outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes.贫血预测急性冠脉综合征患者的预后。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jun-Jul;106(6-7):357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
5
Perceived risk of ischemic and bleeding events in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征中缺血和出血事件的感知风险。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):299-308. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000072. Epub 2013 May 7.
6
[Development and validation of risk score model for acute myocardial infarction in China: prognostic value thereof for in hospital major adverse cardiac events and evaluation of revascularization].中国急性心肌梗死风险评分模型的建立与验证:其对院内主要不良心脏事件的预后价值及血运重建评估
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Jul 8;88(26):1815-9.
7
Comparison of the predictive value of four different risk scores for outcomes of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.四种不同风险评分对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者预后预测价值的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;102(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.088. Epub 2008 May 28.
8
Walking beyond the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) model in the death risk stratification during hospitalization in patients with acute coronary syndrome: what do the AR-G (ACTION [Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network] Registry and GWTG [Get With the Guidelines] Database), NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry), and EuroHeart Risk Scores Provide?在急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间的死亡风险分层中,超越 GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件注册)模型:AR-G(ACTION [急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结果网络]注册和 GWTG [遵循指南]数据库)、NCDR(国家心血管数据注册)和 EuroHeart 风险评分提供了什么?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov;5(11):1117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.023.
9
Improving risk stratification in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with combined assessment of GRACE and CRUSADE risk scores.通过综合评估GRACE和CRUSADE风险评分改善非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的风险分层
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Dec;107(12):681-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
10
[Comparison of value of GRACE, APACHEII and REMS for early prognosis of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction].[GRACE、APACHEII和REMS对急性心肌梗死患者早期死亡预后价值的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Nov;25(11):660-3. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.11.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of GRACE Risk Scores in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.GRACE风险评分在非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者中的预后价值
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Feb 16;8:582246. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.582246. eCollection 2021.
2
Predicting 6-Month Mortality for Older Adults Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Cohort Study.预测老年急性心肌梗死住院患者 6 个月死亡率的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):12-21. doi: 10.7326/M19-0974. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
3
Prognostic Accuracy of the GRACE Score in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians with Acute Coronary Syndromes.
GRACE评分对患有急性冠脉综合征的八旬和九旬老人的预后准确性
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Jan;110(1):24-29. doi: 10.5935/abc.20170175. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Canada acute coronary syndrome score was a stronger baseline predictor than age ≥75 years of in-hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients in western Romania.在罗马尼亚西部的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,加拿大急性冠状动脉综合征评分比年龄≥75岁更能作为院内死亡率的基线预测指标。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Apr 26;11:481-8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S104943. eCollection 2016.
5
Validation of the Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Score for Hospital Mortality in the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events-2.海湾急性冠状动脉事件注册研究-2中加拿大急性冠状动脉综合征住院死亡率风险评分的验证
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Sep;38(9):542-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.22446.