Hearn James D
California State University, Northridge, 6399 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste. 208, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
Med Law. 2013 Jun;32(2):177-89.
In a public health disaster, such as an influenza pandemic, the focus of medical care shifts from the needs of the individual to those of the community, so that the greatest good for the greatest number may be achieved. In a pandemic it will be necessary to maximize the benefit derived from all available local resources. Triage is the device employed to decide which patients will receive these limited medical resources. Current Pandemic Influenza triage protocols uniformly omit any consideration of individual social utility, value or worth. Yet, based upon the severity of a pandemic it may be necessary and justifiable to include these criteria in making allocation decisions. The extent and manner of inclusion will directly correlate with pandemic severity. This paper considers existing protocols and proposes a manner for fully realizing the goals applicable in a public health crisis.
在公共卫生灾难中,如流感大流行,医疗护理的重点从个人需求转向社区需求,以便实现最大多数人的最大利益。在大流行期间,有必要使从所有可用的当地资源中获得的益处最大化。分诊是用于决定哪些患者将获得这些有限医疗资源的手段。当前的大流行性流感分诊方案一律忽略对个人社会效用、价值或价值的任何考虑。然而,根据大流行的严重程度,在做出分配决策时纳入这些标准可能是必要且合理的。纳入的程度和方式将与大流行的严重程度直接相关。本文考虑了现有方案,并提出了一种充分实现适用于公共卫生危机的目标的方法。