• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人双重使用者中医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标率的比较。

Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator Rates Among Veteran Dual Users.

作者信息

Chen Qi, Hanchate Amresh, Shwartz Michael, Borzecki Ann M, Mull Hillary J, Shin Marlena H, Rosen Amy K

机构信息

Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA

Center for Organization, Leadership, and Management Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):335-43. doi: 10.1177/1062860613499402. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1177/1062860613499402
PMID:23969475
Abstract

This study compares rates of 11 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) among 266 203 veteran dual users (ie, those with hospitalizations in both the Veterans Health Administration [VA] and the private sector through Medicare fee-for-service coverage) during 2002 to 2007. PSI risk-adjusted rates were calculated using the PSI software (version 3.1a). Rates of pressure ulcer, central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections, and postoperative sepsis, areas in which the VA has focused quality improvement efforts, were found to be significantly lower in the VA than in the private sector. VA had significantly higher rates for 7 of the remaining 8 PSIs, although the rates of only 2 PSIs (postoperative hemorrhage/hematoma and accidental puncture or laceration) remained higher in the VA after sensitivity analyses were conducted. A better understanding of system-level differences in coding practices and patient severity, poorly documented in administrative data, is needed before conclusions about differences in quality can be drawn.

摘要

本研究比较了2002年至2007年期间266203名退伍军人双重使用者(即那些通过医疗保险按服务收费覆盖在退伍军人健康管理局[VA]和私营部门均有住院治疗的患者)中11项医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标(PSIs)的发生率。使用PSI软件(3.1a版)计算PSI风险调整率。在VA集中开展质量改进工作的压力性溃疡、中心静脉导管相关血流感染和术后败血症领域,VA的发生率显著低于私营部门。在其余8项PSIs中的7项上,VA的发生率显著更高,不过在进行敏感性分析后,VA中只有2项PSIs(术后出血/血肿和意外穿刺或撕裂伤)的发生率仍然更高。在得出关于质量差异的结论之前,需要更好地了解行政数据中记录不佳的编码实践和患者严重程度方面的系统层面差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator Rates Among Veteran Dual Users.退伍军人双重使用者中医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标率的比较。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):335-43. doi: 10.1177/1062860613499402. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
2
Examining the relationship between processes of care and selected AHRQ patient safety indicators postoperative wound dehiscence and accidental puncture or laceration using the VA electronic medical record.利用退伍军人事务部电子病历检查护理流程与选定的美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标(术后伤口裂开和意外穿刺或撕裂伤)之间的关系。
Am J Med Qual. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):206-13. doi: 10.1177/1062860612459070. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
3
Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions.审查 AHRQ 患者安全指标 (PSIs) 对退伍军人健康管理局的影响:再入院案例。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7.
4
Using the patient safety indicators to detect potential safety events among US veterans with psychotic disorders: clinical and research implications.利用患者安全指标检测美国患有精神障碍的退伍军人中的潜在安全事件:临床和研究意义。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):321-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs026. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
5
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?验证退伍军人健康管理局的患者安全指标:它们是否能准确识别真实的安全事件?
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):74-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182293edf.
6
Tracking rates of Patient Safety Indicators over time: lessons from the Veterans Administration.随时间推移追踪患者安全指标的比率:来自退伍军人事务部的经验教训。
Med Care. 2006 Sep;44(9):850-61. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220686.82472.9c.
7
Validity of the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Hospital-acquired Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医疗保健研究与质量机构患者安全指标及医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心医院获得性疾病的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Med Care. 2016 Dec;54(12):1105-1111. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000550.
8
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标对儿童医院的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):135-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1083. Epub 2004 Dec 3.
9
Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?评估患者安全指标:它们在退伍军人健康管理局的数据上表现如何?
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):873-84. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb.
10
Comparing measures of patient safety for inpatient care provided to veterans within and outside the VA system in New York.比较纽约退伍军人事务部(VA)系统内外为退伍军人提供的住院护理的患者安全措施。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):58-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020735.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the role of selection bias in quality comparisons between the Veterans Health Administration and community care? Example of elective hernia surgery.在 Veterans Health Administration 和社区护理之间的质量比较中,选择偏倚的作用是什么?择期疝手术的例子。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):654-662. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14113. Epub 2022 Dec 25.
2
Outcomes of Care for Ischemic Heart Disease and Chronic Heart Failure in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人事务部缺血性心脏病和慢性心力衰竭的治疗结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):563-571. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1115.
3
Navigating a ship with a broken compass: evaluating standard algorithms to measure patient safety.
用失灵的罗盘驾驶船只:评估衡量患者安全的标准算法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):310-315. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw126.